Open Access

Neoadjuvant treatment of Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans of pancreas with Imatinib: case report and systematic review of literature

  • Mashaal Dhir1,
  • David G Crockett2,
  • Todd M Stevens3,
  • Peter T Silberstein4,
  • William J Hunter5 and
  • Jason M Foster1Email author
Clinical Sarcoma Research20144:8

DOI: 10.1186/2045-3329-4-8

Received: 14 May 2014

Accepted: 7 July 2014

Published: 6 August 2014

Abstract

Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans (DFSP) is a rare skin tumor, characterized by frequent local recurrence but is seldom metastatic. It is histologically characterized by storiform arrangement of spindle cells. Cytogenetically, most tumors are characterized by translocation 17:22 leading to overexpression of tyrosine kinase PDGFB which can be targeted with tyrosine kinase inhibitor, Imatinib. We describe the first case of unresectable pancreatic metastases from DFSP treated with neoadjuvant Imatinib and subsequently R0 metastectomy. Additionally, a comprehensive systematic review of DFSP pancreatic metastases and the current published data on the use of Imatinib in DFSP is summarized.

Keywords

Pancreatic metastases DFSP Imatinib Systematic review

Background

Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans (DFSP) is a rare fibrohistiocytic tumor of the skin or subcutaneous tissue that is often locally infiltrative but rarely metastatic[1, 2]. Cytogenetically, DFSP is characterized by a pathognomonic translocation t(17;22) (22;q13) with fusion of the COL1A1 gene on chromosome 17 with the PDGFB gene on chromosome 22[3]. This event results in constitutive expression of ligand PDGFB creating an autocrine stimulatory loop that drives cell proliferation and fibrosis. Clinically, it commonly presents in younger adults growing slowly over many years[2, 4]. Microsatellite instability and p53 mutations are involved in tumor progression to the fibrosarcomatous variant (DFSP-FS)[5]. Although the major recurrence risk for DFSP is local relapse, DFSP-FS subtype is associated with an aggressive clinical course, more likely to develop distant metastases[6, 7]. Several case reports in the literature have demonstrated that DFSP can metastasize to the lungs[810], as well as, pancreatic or retroperitoneal spaces similar to the current case[1113]. The optimal treatment of primary and metastatic DFSP is complete surgical resection with negative margins[14]. Over 90% of DFSPs, demonstrate a constitutive activation of platelet-derived growth factor receptor, making inhibition with a promiscuous tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), Imatinib a good option for unresectable, recurrent, or metastatic disease[15]. There have been several reports of neoadjuvant Imatinib for locally advanced primary tumors and adjuvant Imatinib for resected margin positive primary disease and metastatic disease[1620]. There have been no published reports of neoadjuvant Imatinib for unresectable metastatic DFSP to the pancreas successfully treated and subsequently resected. Here, we present the first reported case of unresectable metastatic DFSP to the pancreas, successfully resected following neoadjuvant Imatinib. Additionally, we conducted a systematic review of the literature for pancreatic metastases of DFSP and use of Imatinib in DFSP.

Case presentation

A 31 year old African American male was diagnosed with DFSP of the skin and soft tissue of the anterior left chest wall and shoulder in 2005 and underwent local excision at an outside facility in December, 2005. Grossly, the excised specimen consisted of a 22.0 × 18.0 × 9.5 cm portion of skin & subcutaneous tissue that contained a multinodular and glistening dermal & subcutaneous mass. Histologically, this revealed a neoplasm consisting of atypical spindled cells arranged in a storiform pattern that invaded the dermis and subcutaneous tissue (Figure 1A). Large parts of this tumor showed areas histologically reminiscent of fibrosarcoma (at least 75% of the tumor), characterized by spindled mesenchymal cells with high grade cytologic atypia arranged in broad fascicles forming a “Herringbone” pattern (Figure 1B), with more than 10 mitotic figures per high powered field. This neoplasm showed expression of CD34 by immunohistochemistry (Figure 1C), but was negative for Desmin, S100, Pan-cytokeratin, BCL-2, and CD117 expression. The deep margin of resection was focally positive for the neoplasm. A diagnosis of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans with fibrosarcomatous transformation (DFSP-FS) was rendered.The patient received no other therapy at that time and did well until October 2007, when he presented to the emergency department with severe anemia and a hemoglobin of 4 g/dL. Surgical Oncology was consulted after an abdominal CT scan revealed a heterogeneous mass in the left upper quadrant involving the pancreas, spleen, adrenal, left lobe of liver, and stomach measuring 17 × 18 × 23 cm (Figure 2A). A core biopsy of this retroperitoneal mass was obtained that showed spindle shaped mesenchymal cells with high grade cytologic atypia (Figure 2B) essentially identical to the fibrosarcomatous areas that were seen in the 2005 chest wall DFSP-FS. These malignant cells showed an identical immunophenotype as the original chest wall tumor (see above). A dual fusion DNA FISH probe set for the COL1A1 (17q21) and PDGFB (22q13) genes was positive for a COL1A1-PDGFB translocation (Figure 2C), consistent with DFSP-FS metastasis to the retroperitoneum.Radiographically, this retroperitoneal tumor was unresectable and the patient was started on Imatinib therapy 400 mg BID. The patient tolerated this dose without any reported side effects and after 18 months of Imatinib therapy, the tumor exhibited a dramatic response with a 70% size reduction and radiographically appeared to be amenable to margin negative (R0) surgical resection (Figure 3). A left upper quadrant exenteration (en-bloc resection including a subtotal distal pancreatectomy, splenectomy, left adrenalectomy, and subtotal gastrectomy) was performed with negative margins on September 1, 2009 (Figure 4A-C). Post-Imatinib, this resected tumor showed dramatically altered histology, revealing primarily hyalinized and myxoid fibrous differentiated stroma (Figure 5A) with focal atypical spindle cells (Figure 5B-C) that revealed a COL1A1-PDGFB fusion by interphase FISH analysis, consistent with a dramatic gross and histologic response of the metastatic DFSP-FS to the Imatinib. The lymph nodes were negative for tumor.
Figure 1

Histology of Primary tumor. A) The left chest wall mass excised in 2005 showed an invasive spindle cell neoplasm with B) areas of high grade, fibrosarcomatous transformation with Herringbone architecture. C) The tumor showed CD34 expression and this, along with the fibrosarcomatous areas and high mitotic rate, were consistent with a dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans with fibrosarcomatous transformation (DFSP-FS).

Figure 2

Radiographs of metastatic disease at diagnosis. A) CT scan demonstrating a large unresectable tumor involving all organs in the left upper abdomen. B) Biopsy of this mass showed malignant high grade spindled cells, C) a COL1A1-PDGFB translocation by dual fusion FISH probe set (yellow signals indicate the fusion signal), consistent with metastatic dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans with fibrosarcomatous transformation (DFSP-FS).

Figure 3

CT scan illustrating post imatinib decrease in size of the tumor now amenable to surgical resection.

Figure 4

Gross R 0 tumor resection specimen: subtotal distal pancreatectomy, subtotal gastrectomy, splenectomy, adrenalectomy. A) Anterior view B) Posterior view C) Cross sectional view.

Figure 5

Histology post-Imatinib Resected retroperitoneal tumor showed a hyalinized hypocellular mass. A) Splenic tissue is demonstrated on the left in the current section. B & C) Focally, the tumor demonstrated residual atypical spindle cells that revealed a COL1A1-PDGFB fusion by interphase FISH (not shown), consistent with a dramatic histologic response of metastatic DFSP-FS to Imatinib.

The patient resumed adjuvant Imatinib for 6 months and remained free of disease for 14 months, off therapy. His imaging at 14 months revealed para-aortic nodal disease without evidence of local recurrence that responded to reinstitution of Imatinib at the same dose. The patient is now five years out from the initial diagnosis of metastatic disease and remains in remission on Imatinib.

Systematic review: Pancreatic metastasis of Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans

Methodology

A Medline search was performed using the key words (a) “Pancreatic metastasis” AND “Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans” (b) “Pancreas” AND “Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans”. Similarly, an Embase search was performed using the key words (a) “Pancreatic metastasis” AND “Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans”. Medline and Embase search using strategy (a) revealed 2 articles[13, 21]. Search strategy (b) identified 3 articles[11, 13, 22]. Backward search was performed using the references from full texts of these 4 articles and no additional articles were found.

Results

We identified 4 articles reporting pancreatic metastases from DFSP[11, 13, 21, 22]. A summary of these articles is provided in Additional file1. Two of these patients were found to have pancreatic metastases during follow up and this appeared to be the only site of metastases[13, 21]. In another patient reported by Winter et al., diagnosis was not clear preoperatively[11]. Interestingly, all three of these patients had aggressive disease with fibrosarcomatous variant of DFSP, high mitotic counts, relatively short disease free interval and did not have local recurrence prior to development of metastatic disease. In the report by Onoda et al. a patient had multiple local recurrences with relatively more aggressive features at each recurrence and finally died of brain metastases. Patient was found to have pancreatic and other systemic metastases at autopsy. No studies described the use of Imatinib as a neoadjuvant strategy to treat the pancreatic metastases.

Systematic review: use of Imatinib in Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans

Methodology

Figure 6 describes the search strategy in detail. A Medline search was performed using key words “Imatinib” AND “Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans” which resulted in 98 articles. A title and abstract review (wherever available) of all articles was performed. After exclusion of preclinical studies (studies on cell lines) we were able to identify 48 articles which mentioned DFSP and either implied or reported the use of Imatinib in patients. Full texts of these 45 articles were reviewed. Information was gathered from abstracts only, for 3 studies in non-English languages. Backward search was also performed using the references of these 45 articles and full texts of 12 randomly selected review articles. Twelve studies were excluded (exclusion criteria mentioned in Figure 6). Briefly, exclusion criteria include a) studies which did not use Imatinib b) duplicate studies c) studies which discussed molecular characteristics only d) critiques of other case reports e) described patients whose primary diagnosis was not DFSP. A total of 36 articles were included in the systematic review[16, 1820, 2354]. Response to Imatinib was defined as complete clinical or pathologic response, partial response or stable disease.
Figure 6

Search strategy flow diagrams. A &B Diagrams depicting the search strategy for systematic review of the use of Imatinib in patients with Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans.

After completing the Medline search, an Embase search was also performed using key words “Imatinib” AND “Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans” which revealed 348 items including 152 review articles. After exclusion of studies already identified using Medline search, we were able to identify an additional 5 case reports[5559] and 6 case series[6065] (5 in abstract form[60, 61, 6365]). There was one more case report in non-English language, describing neoadjuvant Imatinib for DFSP of the face, for which no abstract was available[66].

Results

We identified 23 case reports[19, 20, 2325, 27, 2932, 35, 38, 39, 41, 42, 5052],[5559], 15 case series[16, 26, 33, 34, 36, 37, 45, 47, 53, 6065], 6 phase II studies[18, 40, 46, 48, 49] and 4 pediatric studies[28, 43, 44, 54] where Imatinib was used for the treatment of patients with DFSP. These studies include a total of 199 patients. Additional files2,3,4 and5 provide a summary of these studies including case reports (Additional file2), case series (Additional file3), phase II studies (Additional file4) and pediatric reports/series (Additional file5). A phase II study of malignancies associated with Imatinib sensitive tyrosine kinases, by Heinrich et al. was excluded. A subset of patients with DFSP in this study were further analyzed and reported separately by McArthur et al.[40, 67].

All except one case report described some response to Imatinib[38]. Since the response assessment criteria varied in many case series and to minimize bias, only phase II studies were used for calculation of percentage response to Imatinib. Overall combined response rate (Complete, partial or stable disease) was 65% (48/74 patients) in phase II studies. Common indications for use of Imatinib in the selected studies included locally advanced primary, primary tumor in a cosmetically sensitive location, locally recurrent tumors, positive margins or metastatic disease. Commonly used dosages include 400 mg/day, 400 mg twice daily or 800 mg/day. Some studies utilized a dose escalation strategy where patients were started on 400 mg/day and dose was gradually increased to 600 mg/day and then 800 mg/day based on tolerance and side effects. Others utilized a higher dose of 400 mg twice daily or 800 mg/day and decreased the dose depending on the side effects. Duration of adjuvant strategy varied from 2 months to 2 years whereas neoadjuvant treatment was guided by response of the tumor to the therapy.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first case report where an unresectable pancreatic metastasis was treated in a neoadjuvant fashion with Imatinib and an R0 resection was successfully performed. Consistent with findings observed in neoadjuvant therapy for primary cutaneous disease, when a clinical and radiographic reduction in tumor size is observed, it corresponds with the histologic findings of markedly decreased cellularity as evidenced by fewer CD34+ cells, along with significant hyalinization of dermal collagen as seen in our case (Figure 5A-C). In the current case, neoadjuvant Imatinib resolved the presenting symptoms (GI bleeding, anemia, and pain) and enabled R0 resection of an unresectable metastasis. The dose of 400 mg BID was selected based on the only published phase II study, B2225 at that time in 2007[40]. This study reported a 100% response rate in eight locally advanced t (17;22) positive DFPS tumors with four patients (50%) exhibiting complete responses. Additionally McArthur et al. reported 7/8 (88%) patients tolerated the therapy with only one patient requiring dose reduction to 600 mg. Since B2225 three additional phase II trials (Additional file4) have been conducted evaluating 400 mg, 600 mg and 800 mg doses which have reported similar efficacy and tolerance profiles[46, 49].

In this case 400 mg BID Imatinib followed by resection facilitated excellent local control evident now 5 years post metastatectomy, 10-years from primary cutaneous diagnosis without resection bed recurrence. Although, the patient did develop distant, para-aortic nodal metastasis 14 months post-resection, metastatic disease remained Imatinib responsive and demonstrated radiographic resolution with therapy. Importantly the patient did not report any significant gastrointestinal or other side effects during neoadjuvant therapy or subsequent therapy for nodal recurrence.

Conclusions

In conclusion, given the intrinsic biological sensitivity of COL1A1/PDGFB positive DFSP to Imatinib, neoadjuvant therapy with this medication may not only be an important tool in managing locally advanced and recurrent cutaneous disease but equally valuable in unresectable or marginally resectable metastatic DFSP; facilitating margin negative resection, improving local control, and extending disease free and overall survival. The response observed following neoadjuvant Imatinib may also be useful as an in vivo test of tumor’s responsiveness and may be useful in determine the best post-operative adjuvant therapy. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant Imatinib is well established in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST), unlike in DFSP. The results from the closed clinical trial NCT00243191/SARC004 will provide insight into the value of short course therapy in cutaneous disease but additional trials are needed to address the value in the setting of metastatic DFSP. This report highlights the value of neoadjuvant Imatinib in facilitating surgical resection and the continued response of distant disease sites in a patient now over 5-years with metastatic DFSP.

Consent

“Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this Case Report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.”

Abbreviations

COLA1A1: 

Collagen 1 alpha 1

DFSP: 

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans

DFSP- FS: 

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans – fibrosarcomatous type

NED: 

No evidence of disease

PDGFB: 

Platelet derived growth factor beta.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Surgery, Surgical Oncology, 986345 University of Nebraska Medical Center
(2)
Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center
(3)
Department of Pathology, University of Missouri
(4)
Department of Hematology and Oncology, Creighton University Medical Center
(5)
Department of Anatomic Pathology, Creighton University Medical Center

References

  1. Llombart B, Serra-Guillen C, Monteagudo C, Lopez Guerrero JA, Sanmartin O: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a comprehensive review and update on diagnosis and management. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2013, 30: 13-28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Criscione VD, Weinstock MA: Descriptive epidemiology of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans in the United States, 1973 to 2002. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007, 56: 968-973.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. McArthur GA: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a surgical disease with a molecular savior. Curr Opin Oncol. 2006, 18: 341-346.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowne WB, Antonescu CR, Leung DH, Katz SC, Hawkins WG, Woodruff JM, Brennan MF, Lewis JJ: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a clinicopathologic analysis of patients treated and followed at a single institution. Cancer. 2000, 88: 2711-2720.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Takahira T, Oda Y, Tamiya S, Yamamoto H, Kawaguchi K, Kobayashi C, Oda S, Iwamoto Y, Tsuneyoshi M: Microsatellite instability and p53 mutation associated with tumor progression in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Hum Pathol. 2004, 35: 240-245.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Abbott JJ, Oliveira AM, Nascimento AG: The prognostic significance of fibrosarcomatous transformation in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006, 30: 436-443.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Mentzel T, Beham A, Katenkamp D, Dei Tos AP, Fletcher CD: Fibrosarcomatous (“high-grade”) dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of a series of 41 cases with emphasis on prognostic significance. Am J Surg Pathol. 1998, 22: 576-587.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kini H, Raghuveer CV, Pai MR, S K: Fibrosarcomatous Bednar tumor with distant metastases–a case report. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2004, 47: 26-29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Westermann GW, Buerger H, Kappes U, Matzkies F, Kisters K: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans with lung metastasis in a patient with progressive systemic sclerosis. South Med J. 2002, 95: 363-365.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Zorlu F, Yildiz F, Ertoy D, Atahan IL, Erden E: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans metastasizing to cavernous sinuses and lungs: a case report. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2001, 31: 557-561.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Minter RM, Reith JD, Hochwald SN: Metastatic potential of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans with fibrosarcomatous change. J Surg Oncol. 2003, 82: 201-208.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Suehara Y, Yazawa Y, Hitachi K: Metastatic Bednar tumor (pigmented dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans) with fibrosarcomatous change: a case report. J Orthop Sci. 2004, 9: 662-665.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Yokoyama Y, Murakami Y, Sasaki M, Morifuji M, Hayashidani Y, Kobayashi T, Sudo T, Sueda T: Pancreatic metastasis of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. J Gastroenterol. 2004, 39: 798-800.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Meguerditchian AN, Wang J, Lema B, Kraybill WG, Zeitouni NC, Kane JM 3rd: Wide excision or Mohs micrographic surgery for the treatment of primary dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Am J Clin Oncol. 2010, 33: 300-303.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lemm D, Mugge LO, Mentzel T, Hoffken K: Current treatment options in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2009, 135: 653-665.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Han A, Chen EH, Niedt G, Sherman W, Ratner D: Neoadjuvant imatinib therapy for dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Arch Dermatol. 2009, 145: 792-796.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson-Jahangir H, Sherman W, Ratner D: Using imatinib as neoadjuvant therapy in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: potential pluses and minuses. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 8: 881-885.
  18. Kerob D, Porcher R, Verola O, Dalle S, Maubec E, Aubin F, D’Incan M, Bodokh I, Boulinguez S, Madelaine-Chambrin I, Mathieu-Boue A, Servant JM, de Kerviler E, Janin A, Calvo F, Pedeutour F, Lebbe C: Imatinib mesylate as a preoperative therapy in dermatofibrosarcoma: results of a multicenter phase II study on 25 patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2010, 16: 3288-3295.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lemm D, Muegge LO, Hoeffken K, Aklan T, Mentzel T, Thorwarth M, Schultze-Mosgau S: Remission with Imatinib mesylate treatment in a patient with initially unresectable dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans–a case report. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008, 12: 209-213.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Savoia P, Ortoncelli M, Quaglino P, Bernengo MG: Imatinib mesylate in the treatment of a large unresectable dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a case study. Dermatol Surg. 2006, 32: 1097-1102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Murata H: Fibrosarcomatous variant of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans with pancreatic metastasis. Int J Dermatol. 2014, 53: e140-e142.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Onoda N: Pigmented dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (Bednár tumor). An autopsy case with systemic metastasis. Acta Pathol Jpn. 1990, 40: 935-940.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Rubin BP, Schuetze SM, Eary JF, Norwood TH, Mirza S, Conrad EU, Bruckner JD: Molecular targeting of platelet-derived growth factor B by imatinib mesylate in a patient with metastatic dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. J Clin Oncol. 2002, 20: 3586-3591.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Baars A, Pinedo HM: Good response to treatment with the selective tyrosine-kinase inhibitor imatinib in a patient with metastatic dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2003, 147: 2072-2076.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Bigby SM, Oei P, Lambie NK, Symmans PJ: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: report of a case with a variant ring chromosome and metastases following pregnancy. J Cutan Pathol. 2006, 33: 383-388.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Edelweiss M, Malpica A: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of the vulva: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 13 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010, 34: 393-400.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Fava P, Stroppiana E, Savoia P, Bernengo MG: Halo nevi related to treatment with imatinib in a dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans patient. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010, 24: 244-245.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Gooskens SL, Oranje AP, van Adrichem LN, de Waard-van Der Spek FB, den Hollander JC, van de Ven CP, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM: Imatinib mesylate for children with dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP). Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010, 55: 369-373.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hong JY, Liu X, Mao M, Li M, Choi DI, Kang SW, Lee J, La Choi Y: Genetic aberrations in imatinib-resistant dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans revealed by whole genome sequencing. PLoS One. 2013, 8: e69752-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Jeon IK, Kim JH, Kim SE, Kim SC, Roh MR: Successful treatment of unresectable dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans on finger with imatinib mesylate and Mohs microsurgery. J Dermatol. 2013, 40: 288-289.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Kamar FG, Kairouz VF, Sabri AN: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) successfully treated with sorafenib: case report. Clin Sarcoma Res. 2013, 3 (1): 5-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kasper B, Lossignol D, Gil T, Flamen P, De Saint Aubain N, Awada A: Imatinib mesylate in a patient with metastatic disease originating from a dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of the scalp. Anticancer Drugs. 2006, 17: 1223-1225.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kerob D, Pedeutour F, Leboeuf C, Verola O, de Kerviler E, Servant JM, Sarandi F, Bousquet G, Madelaine-Chambrin I, Pruvost C, Calvo F, Janin A, Lebbe C: Value of cytogenetic analysis in the treatment of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. J Clin Oncol. 2008, 26: 1757-1759.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kim M, Huh CH, Cho KH, Cho S: A study on the prognostic value of clinical and surgical features of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans in Korean patients. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012, 26: 964-971.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Labropoulos SV, Fletcher JA, Oliveira AM, Papadopoulos S, Razis ED: Sustained complete remission of metastatic dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans with imatinib mesylate. Anticancer Drugs. 2005, 16: 461-466.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Llombart B, Sanmartin O, Lopez-Guerrero JA, Monteagudo C, Serra C, Requena C, Poveda A, Vistos JL, Almenar S, Llombart-Bosch A, Guillen C: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: clinical, pathological, and genetic (COL1A1-PDGFB) study with therapeutic implications. Histopathology. 2009, 54: 860-872.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Maki RG, Awan RA, Dixon RH, Jhanwar S, Antonescu CR: Differential sensitivity to imatinib of 2 patients with metastatic sarcoma arising from dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Int J Cancer. 2002, 100: 623-626.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Marakovic J, Vilendecic M, Marinovic T, Lambasa S, Grahovac G: Intracranial recurrence and distant metastasis of scalp dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. J Neurooncol. 2008, 88: 305-308.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Mattox AK, Mehta AI, Grossi PM, Cummings TJ, Adamson DC: Response of malignant scalp dermatofibrosarcoma to presurgical targeted growth factor inhibition. J Neurosurg. 2010, 112: 965-977.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. McArthur GA, Demetri GD, van Oosterom A, Heinrich MC, Debiec-Rychter M, Corless CL, Nikolova Z, Dimitrijevic S, Fletcher JA: Molecular and clinical analysis of locally advanced dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans treated with imatinib: Imatinib Target Exploration Consortium Study B2225. J Clin Oncol. 2005, 23: 866-873.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Mehrany K, Swanson NA, Heinrich MC, Weenig RH, Lee KK, White CR, Devere TS: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a partial response to imatinib therapy. Dermatol Surg. 2006, 32: 456-459.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Mizutani K, Tamada Y, Hara K, Tsuzuki T, Saeki H, Tamaki K, Matsumoto Y: Imatinib mesylate inhibits the growth of metastatic lung lesions in a patient with dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Br J Dermatol. 2004, 151: 235-237.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Posso-De Los Rios CJ, Lara-Corrales I, Ho N: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans in pediatric patients: a report of 17 cases. J Cutan Med Surg. 2014, 18: 1-6.Google Scholar
  44. Price VE, Fletcher JA, Zielenska M, Cole W, Viero S, Manson DE, Stuart M, Pappo AS: Imatinib mesylate: an attractive alternative in young children with large, surgically challenging dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2005, 44: 511-515.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Rutkowski P, Debiec-Rychter M, Nowecki Z, Michej W, Symonides M, Ptaszynski K, Ruka W: Treatment of advanced dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans with imatinib mesylate with or without surgical resection. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2011, 25: 264-270.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Rutkowski P, Van Glabbeke M, Rankin CJ, Ruka W, Rubin BP, Debiec-Rychter M, Lazar A, Gelderblom H, Sciot R, Lopez-Terrada D, Hohenberger P, van Oosterom AT, Schuetze SM, : Imatinib mesylate in advanced dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: pooled analysis of two phase II clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 2010, 28: 1772-1779.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Stacchiotti S, Pedeutour F, Negri T, Conca E, Marrari A, Palassini E, Collini P, Keslair F, Morosi C, Gronchi A, Pilotti S, Casali PG: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans-derived fibrosarcoma: clinical history, biological profile and sensitivity to imatinib. Int J Cancer. 2011, 129: 1761-1772.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Sugiura H, Fujiwara Y, Ando M, Kawai A, Ogose A, Ozaki T, Yokoyama R, Hiruma T, Ishii T, Morioka H, Mugishima H: Multicenter phase II trial assessing effectiveness of imatinib mesylate on relapsed or refractory KIT-positive or PDGFR-positive sarcoma. J Orthop Sci. 15: 654-660.
  49. Ugurel S, Mentzel T, Utikal J, Helmbold P, Mohr P, Pfohler C, Schiller M, Hauschild A, Hein R, Kampgen E, Kellner I, Leverkus M, Becker JC, Ströbel P, Schadendorf D: Neoadjuvant imatinib in advanced primary or locally recurrent dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a multicenter phase II DeCOG trial with long-term follow-up. Clin Cancer Res. 2014, 20: 499-510.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang C, Luo Z, Zheng B, Chen Y, Cao X, Wang J, Zhang R, Shi Y: Imatinib mesylate treatment for a Chinese patient with metastatic and recurrent dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: is sustained partial remission possible?. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2012, 21: 585-587.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Wicherts DA, van Coevorden F, Klomp HM, van Huizum MA, Kerst JM, Haas RL, van Boven HH, van der Hage JA: Complete resection of recurrent and initially unresectable dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans downsized by Imatinib. World J Surg Oncol. 2013, 11: 59-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Wright TI, Petersen JE: Treatment of recurrent dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans with imatinib mesylate, followed by Mohs micrographic surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2007, 33: 741-744.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhu JH, Li QW, Xiao WH, Sun JZ, Wang RL, Lu JY: Advanced dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans treated with imatinib mesylate. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2011, 33: 470-472.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Suzuki D, Kobayashi R, Yasuda K, Yamamoto H, Morioka K, Mikawa M, Kobayashi K: Congenital dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans in a newborn infant with a massive back tumor: favorable effects of oral imatinib on the control of residual tumor growth. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2011, 33: e304-e306.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Agbetiafa K: Partial remission of an unresectable dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans in a Togolese patient treated with imatinib. Nouvelles Dermatologiques. 2012, 31: 167-169.Google Scholar
  56. Chawla B: Recurrent Bilateral Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans of Eyelids. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011, 27: e167-e168.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. George S: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans case report: when drug therapy can obviate the need for surgery. Community Oncol. 2007, 4: 462-463.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Kreze A: Metastasis of Dermatofibrosarcoma from the Abdominal Wall to the Thyroid Gland: case report. Case Rep Med. 2012, 118: 1-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Vagholkar K, Gopinathan I, Nair S, Nachane S, Joglekar O, Vaishampayan A: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a deceptive neoplasm. Internet J Oncol. 2012, 8 (2):http://ispub.com/IJO/8/2/14075,Google Scholar
  60. Eberst L: Scientific Programme – Proffered Papers (1990). Eur J Cancer. 1990, 49: S759-S892.Google Scholar
  61. Elrafei TNN, Chrysofakis G, Simmons N, Reed LJ: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans-derived fibrosarcoma: response to escalated-dose imatinib mesylate (IM) and second-generation kinase inhibitor nilotinib. J Clin Oncol. 2011, 29: suppl abstr e20529,Google Scholar
  62. Fields RC: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP): Predictors of Recurrence and the Use of Systemic Therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011, 18: 328-336.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Michej W: Treatment of advanced dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans with imatinib mesylate with or without surgical resection. Virchows Arch. 2012, 461: S228-Google Scholar
  64. Neves R: Melanoma 2010 Congress. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2010, 23: 874-1004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Sanmartin O: Locally advanced dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans treated with imatinib followed by Mohs surgery: results of six cases of a single institution. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009, 62: AB107-Google Scholar
  66. Aguayo Ortiz RA: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans facial e imatinib neoadyuvante. Piel. 2010, 25: 285-287.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Heinrich MC, Joensuu H, Demetri GD, Corless CL, Apperley J, Fletcher JA, Soulieres D, Dirnhofer S, Harlow A, Town A, McKinley A, Supple SG, Seymour J, Di Scala L, van Oosterom A, Herrmann R, Nikolova Z, McArthur AG, : Phase II, open-label study evaluating the activity of imatinib in treating life-threatening malignancies known to be associated with imatinib-sensitive tyrosine kinases. Clin Cancer Res. 2008, 14: 2717-2725.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Dhir et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement