Efficacy of pazopanib and sunitinib in advanced axial chordoma: a single reference centre case series
© The Author(s) 2016
Received: 13 August 2016
Accepted: 17 October 2016
Published: 1 November 2016
Chordomas are rare malignant tumours of the axial skeleton and skull base supposed to arise from cellular remnants of the notochord. These tumours have the potential to metastasize (30–40 %), usually in the later course of the disease. However, the greatest morbidity is usually a result of loco-regional recurrence with infiltration and destruction of surrounding bone and soft tissue. Patients with unresectable or metastatic chordoma are faced with a poor prognosis since cytotoxic chemotherapy or other systemic therapies have not proven their efficacy yet. However, several molecularly targeted drugs have been proposed as potentially beneficial, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) directed at vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), like pazopanib and sunitinib.
Five patients with unresectable or metastatic chordoma were treated with VEGFR inhibitors pazopanib or sunitinib in the Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC) between 2008 and 2015. Two out of four patients treated with pazopanib derived clinical benefit and disease remained stable for respectively 14 and 15 months. The one patient treated with sunitinib achieved a partial response according to RECIST 1.1 which lasted for a total of 27 months. No serious adverse events were observed.
These results on the use of pazopanib and sunitinib in chordoma are promising, with an objective response on sunitinib and a median progression free interval of 8.5 months (range 3–15 months), comparable to that of imatinib, in the pazopanib subgroup. However further research is needed to assess the definite role of VEGFR inhibitors in chordoma.
KeywordsChordoma Vascular endothelial growth factor Tyrosine kinase inhibitor Pazopanib Sunitinib
Chordomas are rare malignant bone tumours of the axial skeleton and skull base that have a prevalence of less than 1/100,000 . They are supposed to arise from cellular remnants of the notochord that persist during foetal development . These tumours have the potential to metastasize (30–40 %), usually in the later course of the disease. However, the greatest morbidity is generally a result of loco-regional recurrence with infiltration and destruction of surrounding bone and soft tissue [2–4].
The first consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chordoma were published in the Lancet Oncology in 2015 . In patients with localized disease, complete surgical resection with adequate margins offers the best chance of long-term control. Definitive (proton beam) radiotherapy is the preferred alternative in case resection is not feasible. The addition of standard adjuvant radiotherapy is recommended for skull base and cervical spine chordoma. In sacral chordoma the consensus guidelines recommend consideration of radiotherapy in case of R1 resection . However, results from another retrospective patient series show that the time to recurrence is significantly longer with the addition of radiotherapy, accompanied by a trend towards longer overall survival, and thus support the strategy to add radiotherapy as standard adjuvant therapy . Ten-year local recurrence free survival rates after initial surgery is 33–49 %. In case of loco-regional recurrence prognosis is poor and a number of palliative treatment modalities can be considered, e.g. (debulking) surgery and (stereotactic or heavy particle) radiation .
Cytotoxic chemotherapy or other systemic therapies have not proven their efficacy and are therefore not recommended in any line of treatment . A better molecular understanding of chordoma can be helpful to identify targetable pathways. So far, only systemic treatment with the platelet derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib has shown positive results in a phase 2 study in advanced chordoma. This trial included 56 patients of whom one (2 %) achieved a partial response according to RECIST 1.1 and another 20 % a minor response. Median progression-free survival was 9 months. Moreover, 64 % of patients derived clinical benefit and 70 % of patients stable disease (SD) . The positive results of this trial have led to funding for its use in chordoma patients in some countries.
Several other molecularly targeted drugs directed at pathways believed to be implicated in chordoma have been evaluated, including the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-inhibitors erlotinib, gefitinib and lapatinib, the mTOR (mechanistic target of rapamycin)-inhibitor sirolimus, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-inhibitor bevacizumab. Most of these drugs have shown modest activity in case reports and case series, administered either as monotherapy or combined with other agents [7–13]. A dedicated phase 2 study of lapatinib in EGFR-positive chordoma resulted in a progression free survival (PFS) of 8 months . Furthermore, a phase 2 study on sorafenib in 27 patients with advanced and metastatic chordoma by the French Sarcoma Group, resulted in a 9-month progression free rate of 73 % and a 12-month overall survival rate of 86.5 % .
The effect of pazopanib and sunitinib was only published for a limited numbers of patients (pazopanib 1 patient and sunitinib 9 patients) [16, 17]. These multi-targeted kinase inhibitors not only inhibit PDFGR, but also the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) considered relevant for chordoma progression.
Inhibition of pro-angiogenic growth factors like VEGFR may be relevant in chordoma genesis and proliferation. Increased expression of established angiogenesis-related factors VEGF, hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 and -9 is observed in chordoma tissue and cell lines [18, 19]. Moreover, expression of MMP-9 was associated with an increased local recurrence rate and unfavourable prognosis . These findings highlight the important role of angiogenesis in chordoma, and VEGFR inhibitors could therefore be a promising therapeutic drug class.
This consecutive case series reports the response of chordoma patients to VEGFR TKIs pazopanib and sunitinib. In the Leiden University Medical Centre, a total of five chordoma patients were treated with these agents between 2008 and 2015; four patients with pazopanib and one patient with sunitinib. The patients treated with pazopanib were part of the “TIP-study”, a prospective pharmacological study investigating the feasibility of pharmacokinetics (PK)-guided individualized dosing to reduce the interpatient variability in pazopanib exposure .
Overview patients treated with pazopanib and sunitinib
Prior local Tx
Prior systemic Tx
Results (RECIST 1.1 criteria)
Intralesional excision + cryosurgery
SD 14 months
Rash gr 1, intermittent diarrhoea max gr 2, fatigue gr 2, loss pigment hair
SD 15 months
Fatigue gr 1
En-bloc resection (adequate margins)
PD 3 months
Intermittent nausea and vomiting gr 1
Intralesional excision 3x
Stereotactic radiotherapy after 1st surgery
PD 3 months, paraplegia
Intralesional excision 3x
Adjuvant radiotherapy after 2nd surgery
Radiologic response (PR) 3 months
SD 27 months
Dose reduction due to gr 2 nausea. Other symptoms: intermittent fatigue gr 2, hand-foot syndrome gr 1, epistaxis gr 1, thrombocytopenia gr 2
The first patient is a 47-year old male who was referred to our hospital for systemic treatment of a multifocal recurrence of his sacral chordoma. The chordoma was diagnosed 2 years earlier and treated with intralesional excision and cryosurgery, followed by postoperative radiotherapy (60 Gy, boost of 66 Gy presacral area of suspected irradical resection). Pazopanib was started at a dose of 800 mg/day, and reduced to 600 mg/day 4 weeks later due to blood area under the curve (AUC) levels above the minimum threshold for activity [20, 21]. Overall, pazopanib was well tolerated; the patient reported loss of hair pigment, grade 1 skin rash on his legs, fatigue grade 2 and intermittent diarrhoea (maximum grade 2) for which he successfully used loperamide. The disease remained stable according to RECIST 1.1 (with scans approximately every 4 months) for 14 months until the patient noticed increasing back pain radiating to his left buttock. MRI scan showed progression of the sacral tumour mass. Since other tumour localizations remained stable, pazopanib was continued for another 6 months while a palliative sacral resection was scheduled. The patient died of progressive disease 9 months after resection and discontinuation of pazopanib.
Patient 3 is a 66-year old male with a sacral chordoma diagnosed in 2010. Primary treatment, consisting of en-bloc resection with adequate margins, was complicated by post-operative urosepsis and development of a large seroma. Scheduled adjuvant radiotherapy was omitted due to these complications. A multifocal local recurrence was diagnosed 2 years later and first line systemic treatment with pazopanib (800 mg/day) started. The patient reported intermittent grade 1 nausea, but tolerated treatment overall well. Unfortunately, progressive disease according to RECIST 1.1 was seen on MRI after only 3 months of treatment. Pazopanib was discontinued and patient went on to have palliative radiotherapy on subcutaneous metastases (36 Gy). His disease is clinically stable since radiotherapy treatment in March 2013, although MRI scans do show progression of existing lesions.
The fourth and last patient treated with pazopanib is a 42-year old male with a chordoma of the spine, primary lesion in corpus of Th11 with associated myelum compression. He was diagnosed 3 years before and underwent three consecutive intralesional resections with stereotactic radiotherapy (39 Gy) after the first surgery. He presented in our hospital with progressive intraspinal and hepatic metastases after 9 months of systemic treatment with imatinib. Second line treatment with pazopanib was started at a dose of 800 mg/day, and patient was temporarily dose reduced to 600 mg/day due to elevated AUC levels. Aside from grade 1 haemoptysis, related to an incidental pulmonary embolism, no other side-effects were reported. Three months after the start of pazopanib, this patient was hospitalized with acute paraplegia secondary to progressive spinal lesions (RECIST 1.1 progressive disease). Pazopanib was discontinued and there were no further surgical or radiotherapy options for this patient. He died a year later as a result of disease progression.
Progression-free interval was defined as time from first dose of drug until date of confirmed radiological disease progression according to RECIST 1.1. All patients reached the RECIST 1.1 progressive disease endpoint. The mean progression-free interval for patients in the pazopanib group was 8.5 months and 14 months overall.
This case series describes the effect of VEGFR TKIs pazopanib in four patients and sunitinib in one patient with unresectable or progressive chordoma treated in the Leiden University Medical Centre.
A partial response according to RECIST 1.1 was seen in the only patient using sunitinib and three out of five patients reported symptomatic improvement. The median progression free interval was 8.5 months in the pazopanib subgroup, 27 months in the patient treated with sunitinib and 14 months overall. Treatment was well tolerated with only mild to moderate side effects. In the pazopanib group patients reported the following side effects: skin rash (25 %), fatigue (50 %), diarrhoea (25 %) and nausea (25 %). The patient on sunitinib was treated with a reduced dose due to on-going grade 2 nausea and experienced fatigue, hand-foot syndrome and thrombocytopenia. The dose reductions in the pazopanib patients were solely based on blood drug levels as a part of the TIP study and were not a result of adverse events.
Limitations to this case series are primarily its retrospective and unplanned analysis and small patient numbers. Response evaluation was not standardized as imaging was performed every 2–6 months for the different patients.
However, results from small case series like this are important, since experience with the use of pazopanib and sunitinib in chordoma in literature reports is limited. A phase 2 trial of sunitinib in 53 patients with nongastrointestinal stromal tumour sarcomas included nine patients with chordoma. No radiological responses by RECIST 1.1 or metabolic responses by FDG-PET were seen, but four out of nine chordoma patients had stable disease for a period ranging from 17 to 70 weeks . We could find only one Japanese case report on pazopanib used in chordoma. This patient achieved a partial response with a significant reduction in tumour size and was treated for a total of 14 months until progression .
The results from our case series on the use of VEGFR inhibitors pazopanib and sunitinib in chordoma are promising, with an partial response according to RECIST 1.1 on sunitinib and a median PFS of 8.5 months, comparable to that of imatinib , in the pazopanib subgroup. New treatment strategies are urgently needed for these patients with unresectable chordomas: a situation that can lead to severe morbidity and represents an unmet medical need. Large randomized trials will not be feasible due to the rarity of the disease. A definite role of VEGFR TKIs can only be established after a prospective phase II study, either randomized cross-over or compared to historical controls aiming for at least 12 months PFS in first line or 9 months in second of later line after imatinib. We would like to challenge regulators, pharmaceutical industry and sponsors to support such registration trials with VEGFR TKIs in this difficult disease state.
area under the curve
epidermal growth factor receptor
hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha
mammalian target of rapamycin
platelet derived growth factor receptor
progression free survival
tyrosine kinase inhibitor
vascular endothelial growth factor receptor
AL participated in the collection of the data and the literature search and drafted the manuscript. HG and SD participated in the design of the study and corrected the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Availability of data and materials
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Consent for publication
Written informed consent was obtained from all patients in the TIP PK study and the sunitinib compassionate use programme for use of their medical data for scientific purposes.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethics approval for the TIP-study was obtained from the local ethical committee (METC at the LUMC) under number P11.217. Ethical approval was not required for the single patient treated within the sunitinib compassionate use programme.
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or non-profit sectors.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Newton H. Chordoma. In: Raghavan DBM, Johnson DH, et al., editors. Textbooks of uncommon cancer. 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley; 2006. p. 614–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Flanagan AM. Chordoma. In: World Health Organisation (WHO) classification of tumours of soft tissue and bone. Lyon: IARC Press; 2013. p. 328–9.Google Scholar
- Mirra JM, Nelson SD, Mertens F. Chordoma. In: Fletcher CDM, Unni KK, Mertens F, editors. Pathology and genetics of tumours of soft tissue and bone. Lyon: IARC Press; 2002. p. 316–7.Google Scholar
- Stacchiotti S, Sommer J, Chordoma Global Consensus G. Building a global consensus approach to chordoma: a position paper from the medical and patient community. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:e71–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moojen WA, Vleggeert-Lankamp CL, Krol AD, Dijkstra SP. Long-term results: adjuvant radiotherapy in en bloc resection of sacrococcygeal chordoma is advisable. Spine. 2011;36:E656–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stacchiotti S, Longhi A, Ferraresi V, et al. Phase II study of imatinib in advanced chordoma. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:914–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Launay SG, Chetaille B, Medina F, et al. Efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor targeting in advanced chordoma: case report and literature review. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:423.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Singhal N, Kotasek D, Parnis FX. Response to erlotinib in a patient with treatment refractory chordoma. Anticancer Drugs. 2009;20:953–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Asklund T, Sandstrom M, Shahidi S, Riklund K, Henriksson R. Durable stabilization of three chordoma cases by bevacizumab and erlotinib. Acta Oncol. 2014;53:980–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Linden O, Stenberg L, Kjellen E. Regression of cervical spinal cord compression in a patient with chordoma following treatment with cetuximab and gefitinib. Acta Oncol. 2009;48:158–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hof H, Welzel T, Debus J. Effectiveness of cetuximab/gefitinib in the therapy of a sacral chordoma. Onkologie. 2006;29:572–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Asklund T, Danfors T, Henriksson R. PET response and tumor stabilization under erlotinib and bevacizumab treatment of an intracranial lesion non-invasively diagnosed as likely chordoma. Clin Neuropathol. 2011;30:242–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stacchiotti S, Marrari A, Tamborini E, et al. Response to imatinib plus sirolimus in advanced chordoma. Ann Oncol. 2009;20:1886–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stacchiotti S, Tamborini E, Lo Vullo S, et al. Phase II study on lapatinib in advanced EGFR-positive chordoma. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:1931–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bompas E, Le Cesne A, Tresch-Bruneel E, et al. Sorafenib in patients with locally advanced and metastatic chordomas: a phase II trial of the French Sarcoma Group (GSF/GETO). Ann Oncol. 2015;26:2168–73.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- George S, Merriam P, Maki RG, et al. Multicenter phase II trial of sunitinib in the treatment of nongastrointestinal stromal tumor sarcomas. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:3154–60.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Shinji A, Okada S, Nakamura T. A case of chordoma of the sacrum treated with pazopanib. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2016;43:267–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li X, Ji Z, Ma Y, Qiu X, Fan Q, Ma B. Expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α, vascular endothelial growth factor and matrix metalloproteinase-2 in sacral chordomas. Oncol Lett. 2012;3:1268–74.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Chen KW, Yang HL, Lu J, et al. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and matrix metalloproteinase-9 in sacral chordoma. J Neurooncol. 2011;101:357–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- de Wit D, van Erp NP, den Hartigh J, et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring to individualize the dosing of pazopanib: a pharmacokinetic feasibility study. Ther Drug Monit. 2015;37:331–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pick AM, Nystrom KK. Pazopanib for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Clin Ther. 2012;34:511–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Soulieres D. Side-effects associated with targeted therapies in renal cell carcinoma. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2013;7:254–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar