Skip to main content


  • Case Report
  • Open Access
  • Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) successfully treated with sorafenib: case report

    Clinical Sarcoma Research20133:5

    • Received: 9 February 2013
    • Accepted: 21 March 2013
    • Published:


    DFSP is a locally invasive, slow-growing tumor of the subcutaneous tissue that rarely metastasizes but recurs frequently after surgical excision. We report herein a case of highly recurrent, locally invasive DFSP that failed both postoperative radiation therapy and complete trial of Imatinib, but was successfully treated with Sorafenib, which showed unprecedented response.


    • Imatinib
    • Sorafenib
    • Angiosarcoma
    • Fibrous Histiocytoma
    • Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans


    Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans (DFSP) is a locally invasive and slow-growing tumor of the subcutaneous tissue. It rarely metastasizes. It was first described in 1924 as a progressive and recurrent dermatofibroma [1]. DFSP has an annual incidence of only 0.8 cases per million and presents typically at mid-adult life with a slight male predominance [2]. The trunk and proximal extremities are the most frequent locations of the disease, but it can occur at any other site.

    DFSPs rarely progress to a high-grade fibrosarcomatous component [3]. One to 4% of patients will develop distant metastasis, typically many years after the development of the initial lesion [4].

    According to the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, The gold standards treatment is complete surgical excision with appropriate reconstruction [5]. Imatinib is approved for treatment of advanced disease [617].

    When resection is limited or incomplete, or margins are positive recurrence rate is high [1820]. In these cases, adjuvant radiation therapy is recommended as well as Imatinib based treatment or enrollment in a clinical trial [5].

    We report hereafter a case of highly recurrent, locally invasive DFSP that failed both postoperative radiation therapy and treatment with Imatinib at 400 mg initially that was then increased to 800 mg. The patient received Sorafenib off label and showed an unprecedented response for his disease.

    Case report

    A 36 year-old gentleman presented with a left shoulder skin lesion that was initially totally excised. Histopathology reported Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans (DFSP). He relapsed sometime after this initial resection and underwent a second surgery followed by several other relapses and re-resections and 2 courses of radiation therapy and ended up having multifocal disease sites on the upper torso, the shoulder and neck. Plastic surgeons exhausted all available skin that could be spared for flaps and reconstruction. After the third relapse and the first round of radiotherapy, he received Imatinib at 400 mg daily with a positive response lasting for about 2 years. Upon progression, he was offered Imatinib 800 mg daily with non negligible side effects and no response.

    All pathology readings of repeated excisions were reported as DFSP except for one time, where the presence of cellular pleomorphism and the lack of CD 34 expression raised the possibility of transformation into a fibrosarcoma. Margins following his third resection were always positive.

    There was no FISH analysis or RT-PCR or molecular studies ordered to detect the presence of the typical chromosomal translocation t(17;22)(q21;q13) in the tumor of this patient, resulting in the chimeric gene COL1A1-PDGFB.

    The patient ended up with left upper extremity amputation at the level of the shoulder and was referred to us.

    He presented with massive and bulky soft tissue lesions on his upper torso and in the neck. A contrast enhanced CT scan also revealed large mediastinal masses and post obstructive pneumopathy on the left.

    He was offered to start on Sorafenib as it was made available for us on compassionate use. A dramatic response was seen after only few days of treatment (Figures 1 and 2). The patient received Sorafenib 800 mg daily for 5 months without recurrence or progression of the tumor. There was no significant side effect reported beside moderate fatigue, and dehiscence of prior surgical wounds. However, he suffered from recurrent pulmonary infections despite decompression of his left main bronchus since attaining a very good partial response, and unfortunately passed away after an episode of septic shock. He remained progression free during the whole treatment time. Therapy was discontinued only one week prior to his death.
    Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Radiological response to Sorafenib.

    Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Clinical improvement and dramatic shrinking of the tumor.


    DFSP accounts for 2 to 6% of all soft tissue sarcomas [21, 22]. It is the most frequent skin sarcoma.

    The tumor involves most frequently the trunk (42-72%), the proximal extremities (16%-30%), and the head and neck (10-16%) especially the scalp [2328].

    The initial presentation of DFSP is a skin lesion described as a single, raised, red to bluish, firm cutaneous nodule or plaque with surrounding discoloration [29]. The lesion is painless and indurated, but is extremely infiltrative and has a locally destructive growth that can invade the underlying structure such as fascia, muscles or bones [1820, 30]. The tumor is often covered by a brown-yellow, red-tinged, sclerodermiform or teleangiectatic and atrophic skin [20]. At the initial stages of the disease, history of trauma, burn or surgical scar is often found.

    At advanced stages, the tumor can ulcerate, bleed, and become painful, as reported in our case.

    Near to 90% of DFSP are considered to be tumors of low-grade malignancy [4]. Histologically, DFSP is identified by a pattern of monomorphous proliferation of cytological bland spindle cells with a visible storiform or whorled (rushmat-like) architecture [4, 23, 31]. Other characteristic features are low mitotic activity and deep, honeycomb infiltration into subcutaneous adipose tissue [30].

    The expression of CD34 is almost a consistent finding and it is extremely useful in differentiation of DFSP from benign fibrous histiocytoma [32], dermatofibroma and other soft tissue tumors [3335]. The sensitivity of CD34 staining in DFSP ranges from 84 to 100% [30].

    Cryptogenic abnormalities are also distinguishable characteristics of DFSP since more than 90% of cases have supernumerary ring chromosomes or a unique translocation involving chromosomes 17 and 22 as in t(17;22)(22;q13) [3641]. This abnormality results in a constitutive stimulation of the platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) with subsequent enhancement of the tumor cell growth [6, 28]. Furthermore, among all the family of PDGF receptors, this translocation is responsible for the activation of PDGFR-beta [42].

    Distant metastasis is rarely observed, with a rate of 4-6%, predominantly to the lungs [20, 30].

    DFSP can transform, especially in the recurring forms, into fibrosarcomatous DFSP (FS-DFSP), a tumor with higher invasion and malignancy potential [3, 4, 28, 43]. It usually requires a more intensive treatment approach.

    The optimal and the mainstay treatment of DFSP, regardless of its location, is wide and deep excision with adequate tumor-free margins. The proper excision with clean margins is directly related to the risk of recurrence of the disease despite adjuvant therapy [18, 19, 44, 45]. The involvement of the deep fascia and muscles requires excision of these structures [18, 19].

    The most significant prognostic factor in patients with DFSP has proved to be the extent of surgical resection. The success of the initial surgical excision has a major effect on the outcome as well. In fact, if this procedure fails and hence, the tumor recurs, it could lead to an uncontrollable local growth, as seen in our case.

    Due to its infiltrative nature, DFSP is characterized by a high recurrence rate varying in the literature from 10-80% [18]. The risk of recurrence was 41% when the excision margin was less than 2 cm and 24% when it was equal to or higher than 2 cm [44].

    DFSP is considered as one of the radiosensitive tumors. Earlier studies suggested that additional postoperative RT reduces the risk of local recurrence in patients with questionable or positive surgical margins [46, 47]. When complete surgical resection is unachievable, RT is indicated [46, 48]. RT can reduce the morbidity or functional impairment associated with extensive resection.

    As seen in the present case, locally recurrent DFSP can be devastating. Salvage by further resection increases the risk of functional deficits and metastatic disease.

    Since the recent identification of the significance of PDGFR activation in the DFSP pathogenesis, the effectiveness of targeted chemotherapy by inhibition of the PDGFR protein-tyrosine kinase has been evaluated. Imatinib, a small adenosine triphosphate analog is a selective PDGFR tyrosine kinase-inhibitor. It was approved for the treatment of DFSP at a dose of 800 mg daily. Such dose is easily reached orally, with non negligible side effects. Some clinical reports showed Imatinib induced regression in patients with recurrent or metastatic DFSP [617].

    However, response was not consistent in all cases as described in our patient.

    To date, no other targeted therapy for DFSP has been reported.

    We report the first case of recurrent and extensive DFSP successfully treated with Sorafenib after failure of postoperative radiation therapy and refractory to treatment with 800 mg of Imatinib.

    Sorafenib is a small molecule B-raf and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor inhibitor. It has shown great value in the treatment of angiosarcomas [49] Maki et al., and some other specific sarcoma subtypes (e.g. peripheral-nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) with loss of NF1 and activation of the ras-raf signaling pathway) [5052].

    Since it has been reported to have an important role in the treatment of some sarcomas, we elected Sorafenib as a salvage option for our patient. The response was remarkable. The tumor almost totally regressed and the patient improved clinically. This case suggests that Sorafenib could be an important targeted therapy for DFSP especially in case of recurrence or metastasis.


    Invasive DSFP could be uncontrollable and challenging to cure. We present a case of recurrent and infiltrative DSFP that failed all conventional therapeutic options. Sorafenib was administered as final resort with impressive results.

    This is to our knowledge the only reported case of DFSP treated with Sorafenib after failure of Imatinib.

    Sorafenib could represent a therapeutic alternative in such cases of DFSP.



    No external funding, apart from the support of the authors' institution, was available for this study.



    Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans


    National comprehensive cancer network


    Fluorescence in situ hybridization


    Platelet-derived growth factor receptor.


    This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Authors’ Affiliations

    Division of Hematology & Oncology, Clemenceau Medical Center, City Center Building, Suite 3 A, Avenue Nouvelle, P.O. Box 1076, Beirut, Jounieh, Lebanon
    Department of Medicine, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
    American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon


    1. Darier J: Dermatofibromes progressifs et recidivants ou fibrosarcomes de la peu. Ann Dermatol Syphiligr (Paris). 1924, 5: 542-562.Google Scholar
    2. McLoughlin PM, Girach M, Wood GA: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of the scalp. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992, 30: 401-403. 10.1016/0266-4356(92)90211-ZView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    3. Mentzel T, Beham A, Katenkamp D, Dei Tos AP, Fletcher CD: Fibrosarcomatous ("high-grade") dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of a series of 41 cases with emphasis on prognostic significance. Am J Surg Pathol. 1998, 22: 576-587. 10.1097/00000478-199805000-00009View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    4. Bowne WB, Antonescu CR, Leung DH: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a clinicopathologic analysis of patients treated and followed at a single institution. Cancer. 2000, 88: 2711-2720. 10.1002/1097-0142(20000615)88:12<2711::AID-CNCR9>3.0.CO;2-MView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    5. Miller SJ, Alam M, Andersen J: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2007, 5: 550-555.PubMedGoogle Scholar
    6. McArthur GA: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a surgical disease with a molecular savior. Curr Opin Oncol. 2006, 18: 341-346. 10.1097/01.cco.0000228739.62756.dfView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    7. Maki RG, Awan RA, Dixon RH, Jhanwar S, Antonescu CR: Differential sensitivity to imatinib of 2 patients with metastatic sarcoma arising from dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Int J Cancer. 2002, 100: 623-626. 10.1002/ijc.10535View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    8. Rubin BP, Schuetze SM, Eary JF: Molecular targeting of platelet-derived growth factor B by imatinib mesylate in a patient with metastatic dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. J Clin Oncol. 2002, 20: 3586-3591. 10.1200/JCO.2002.01.027View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    9. Mizutani K, Tamada Y, Hara K: Imatinib mesylate inhibits the growth of metastatic lung lesions in a patient with dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Br J Dermatol. 2004, 151: 235-237. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.06024.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    10. Labropoulos SV, Fletcher JA, Oliveira AM, Papadopoulos S, Razis ED: Sustained complete remission of metastatic dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans with imatinib mesylate. Anticancer Drugs. 2005, 16: 461-466. 10.1097/00001813-200504000-00014View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    11. Price VE, Fletcher JA, Zielenska M: Imatinib mesylate: an attractive alternative in young children with large, surgically challenging dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2005, 44: 511-515. 10.1002/pbc.20249View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    12. Abrams TA, Schuetze SM: Targeted therapy for dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Curr Oncol Rep. 2006, 8: 291-296. 10.1007/s11912-006-0035-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    13. Kasper B, Lossignol D, Gil T, Flamen P, De Saint AN, Awada A: Imatinib mesylate in a patient with metastatic disease originating from a dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of the scalp. Anticancer Drugs. 2006, 17: 1223-1225. 10.1097/01.cad.0000231486.94191.65View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    14. Mehrany K, Swanson NA, Heinrich MC: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a partial response to imatinib therapy. Dermatol Surg. 2006, 32: 456-459. 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2006.32090.xPubMedGoogle Scholar
    15. Savoia P, Ortoncelli M, Quaglino P, Bernengo MG: Imatinib mesylate in the treatment of a large unresectable dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a case study. Dermatol Surg. 2006, 32: 1097-1102. 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2006.32236.xPubMedGoogle Scholar
    16. McArthur GA: Molecular targeting of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a new approach to a surgical disease. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2007, 5: 557-562.PubMedGoogle Scholar
    17. Ugurel S: Targeted therapy of dermatofibrosarcoma with imatinib. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2007, 5: 261-View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    18. Brabant B, Revol M, Vergote T, Servant JM, Banzet P: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of the chest and the shoulder: wide and deep excisions with immediate reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993, 92: 459-462. 10.1097/00006534-199309000-00012View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    19. Arnaud EJ, Perrault M, Revol M, Servant JM, Banzet P: Surgical treatment of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997, 100: 884-895. 10.1097/00006534-199709001-00009View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    20. Mendenhall WM, Zlotecki RA, Scarborough MT: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Cancer. 2004, 101: 2503-2508. 10.1002/cncr.20678View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    21. Kransdorf MJ: Malignant soft-tissue tumors in a large referral population: distribution of diagnoses by age, sex, and location. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995, 164: 129-134. 10.2214/ajr.164.1.7998525View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    22. Chang CK, Jacobs IA, Salti GI: Outcomes of surgery for dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004, 30: 341-345. 10.1016/j.ejso.2003.12.005View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    23. Gloster HM: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996, 35: 355-374. quiz 375–356, 10.1016/S0190-9622(96)90597-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    24. Criscione VD, Weinstock MA: Descriptive epidemiology of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans in the united states, 1973 to 2002. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007, 56: 968-973. 10.1016/j.jaad.2006.09.006View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    25. Barnes L, Coleman JA, Johnson JT: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of the head and neck. Arch Otolaryngol. 1984, 110: 398-404. 10.1001/archotol.1984.00800320052012View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    26. Taylor HB, Helwig EB: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. A study of 115 cases. Cancer. 1962, 15: 717-725. 10.1002/1097-0142(196207/08)15:4<717::AID-CNCR2820150405>3.0.CO;2-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    27. Stojadinovic A, Karpoff HM, Antonescu CR: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of the head and neck. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000, 7: 696-704. 10.1007/s10434-000-0696-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    28. Fiore M, Miceli R, Mussi C: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans treated at a single institution: a surgical disease with a high cure rate. J Clin Oncol. 2005, 23: 7669-7675. 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.5122View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    29. Wacker J, Khan-Durani B, Hartschuh W: Modified mohs micrographic surgery in the therapy of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: analysis of 22 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2004, 11: 438-444. 10.1245/ASO.2004.06.014View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    30. Lemm D, Mugge LO, Mentzel T, Hoffken K: Current treatment options in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2009, 135: 653-665. 10.1007/s00432-009-0550-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    31. Haycox CL, Odland PB, Olbricht SM, Casey B: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP): growth characteristics based on tumor modeling and a review of cases treated with mohs micrographic surgery. Ann Plast Surg. 1997, 38: 246-251. 10.1097/00000637-199703000-00010View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    32. Weiss SW, Nickoloff BJ: CD-34 is expressed by a distinctive cell population in peripheral nerve, nerve sheath tumors, and related lesions. Am J Surg Pathol. 1993, 17: 1039-1045. 10.1097/00000478-199310000-00009View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    33. Abenoza P, Lillemoe T: CD34 And factor XIIIa in the differential diagnosis of dermatofibroma and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Am J Dermatopathol. 1993, 15: 429-434. 10.1097/00000372-199310000-00003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    34. Zelger B, Sidoroff A, Stanzl U: Deep penetrating dermatofibroma versus dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. A clinicopathologic comparison. Am J Surg Pathol. 1994, 18: 677-686. 10.1097/00000478-199407000-00003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    35. Haycox CL, Odland PB, Olbricht SM, Piepkorn M: Immunohistochemical characterization of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans with practical applications for diagnosis and treatment. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997, 37: 438-444. 10.1016/S0190-9622(97)70146-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    36. Naeem R, Lux ML, Huang SF, Naber SP, Corson JM, Fletcher JA: Ring chromosomes in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans are composed of interspersed sequences from chromosomes 17 and 22. Am J Pathol. 1995, 147: 1553-1558.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
    37. O'Brien KP, Seroussi E, Dal Cin P: Various regions within the alpha-helical domain of the COL1A1 gene are fused to the second exon of the PDGFB gene in dermatofibrosarcomas and giant-cell fibroblastomas. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1998, 23: 187-193. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2264(199810)23:2<187::AID-GCC13>3.0.CO;2-LView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    38. Nishio J, Iwasaki H, Ishiguro M: Supernumerary ring chromosome in a bednar tumor (pigmented dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans) is composed of interspersed sequences from chromosomes 17 and 22: a fluorescence in situ hybridization and comparative genomic hybridization analysis. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2001, 30: 305-309. 10.1002/1098-2264(2000)9999:9999<::AID-GCC1091>3.0.CO;2-RView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    39. Sirvent N, Maire G, Pedeutour F: Genetics of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans family of tumors: from ring chromosomes to tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2003, 37: 1-19. 10.1002/gcc.10202View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    40. Takahira T, Oda Y, Tamiya S: Detection of COL1A1-PDGFB fusion transcripts and PDGFB/PDGFRB mRNA expression in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Mod Pathol. 2007, 20: 668-675. 10.1038/modpathol.3800783View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    41. Patel KU, Szabo SS, Hernandez VS: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans COL1A1-PDGFB fusion is identified in virtually all dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans cases when investigated by newly developed multiplex reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and fluorescence in situ hybridization assays. Hum Pathol. 2008, 39: 184-193. 10.1016/j.humpath.2007.06.009View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    42. Simon MP, Pedeutour F, Sirvent N: Deregulation of the platelet-derived growth factor B-chain gene via fusion with collagen gene COL1A1 in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans and giant-cell fibroblastoma. Nat Genet. 1997, 15: 95-98. 10.1038/ng0197-95View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    43. Szollosi Z, Nemes Z: Transformed dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a clinicopathological study of eight cases. J Clin Pathol. 2005, 58: 751-756. 10.1136/jcp.2004.019349PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    44. Roses DF, Valensi Q, LaTrenta G, Harris MN: Surgical treatment of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1986, 162: 449-452.PubMedGoogle Scholar
    45. Swan MC, Banwell PE, Hollowood K, Goodacre TE: Late recurrence of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans in the female breast: a case report. Br J Plast Surg. 2005, 58: 84-87. 10.1016/j.bjps.2004.06.017View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    46. Sun LM, Wang CJ, Huang CC: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: treatment results of 35 cases. Radiother Oncol. 2000, 57: 175-181. 10.1016/S0167-8140(00)00228-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    47. Dagan R, Morris CG, Zlotecki RA, Scarborough MT, Mendenhall WM: Radiotherapy in the treatment of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Am J Clin Oncol. 2005, 28: 537-539. 10.1097/01.coc.0000171278.69291.64View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    48. Lindner NJ, Scarborough MT, Powell GJ, Spanier S, Enneking WF: Revision surgery in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of the trunk and extremities. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999, 25: 392-397. 10.1053/ejso.1999.0663View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    49. Maki RG, D'Adamo DR, Keohan ML: Phase II study of sorafenib in patients with metastatic or recurrent sarcomas. J Clin Oncol. 2009, 27: 3133-3140. 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.4495PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    50. Jhanwar SC, Chen Q, Li FP, Brennan MF, Woodruff JM: Cytogenetic analysis of soft tissue sarcomas. Recurrent chromosome abnormalities in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST). Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1994, 78: 138-144. 10.1016/0165-4608(94)90081-7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    51. Johnson MR, DeClue JE, Felzmann S: Neurofibromin can inhibit Ras-dependent growth by a mechanism independent of its GTPase-accelerating function. Mol Cell Biol. 1994, 14: 641-645.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    52. Mori S, Satoh T, Koide H, Nakafuku M, Villafranca E, Kaziro Y: Inhibition of Ras/Raf interaction by anti-oncogenic mutants of neurofibromin, the neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) gene product, in cell-free systems. J Biol Chem. 1995, 270: 28834-28838. 10.1074/jbc.270.48.28834View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


    © Kamar et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013