From: UK clinical practice guidelines for the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST)
Levels of evidence |
 I Evidence from at least one large randomised, controlled trial of good methodological quality (low potential for a bias) or meta-analyses of well-conducted randomised trials without heterogeneity |
 II Small randomised trials or large randomised trials with a suspicion of bias (lower methodological quality) or meta-analyses of such trials or of trials with demonstrated heterogeneity |
 III Prospective cohort studies |
 IV Retrospective cohort studies or case–control studies |
 V Studies without control group, case reports, and experts’ opinions |
Grades of recommendation |
 A Strong evidence for efficacy with a substantial clinical benefit, strongly recommended |
 B Strong or moderate evidence for efficacy but with a limited clinical benefit, generally recommended |
 C Insufficient evidence for efficacy or benefit does not outweigh the risk or the disadvantages (adverse events, costs,…), optional |
 D Moderate evidence against efficacy or for adverse outcome, generally not recommended |
 E Strong evidence against efficacy or for adverse outcome, never recommended |