Hibernomas are rare slow-growing benign tumors that consist of brown fat. In 1670, Welch [19] was the first to describe this specialized form of adipose tissue in hibernating animals. None the less, brown fat is also found in more than fifty nonhibernating species, such as human fetuses and newborns [20]. It is believed to represent a kind of fetal fat whose function is to promote nonshivering thermogenesis and gradually is replaced by white adipose tissue with advancing postnatal age to finally comprise less than 0, 1% of the total body weight by the age of 70 years [4, 17, and 21]. However, it may persist in various portions throughout adulthood [9]. Hibernoma is the only tumor known to occur within brown fat and can grow at any location where brown fat remains [6, 16]. Most commonly hibernomas form in the vestiges where brown fat has remained from fetal life such as the periscapular and interscapular region, the neck, axilla, mediastinum, upper thorax and retroperitoneum [4, 22, 23]. Other uncommon locations include the abdomen, thigh, buttock, popliteal fossa and intracranial sites [4]. Based on the largest and most valid demographic study (Soft Tissue AFIP Registry), by Furlong MA et al [3], hibernomas affect mainly adults in the 3rd and 4th decades of life (61% of cases) with a mean age of 38 years. Unlike the previous published data, the AFIP series [3] demonstrates a slight male predominance (58% of cases) with the thigh being the most common location (30% of cases). Our study results are consistent with the aforementioned findings regarding age (range: 19-46 y, mean: 30 y) and location (83,3% of cases located in the thigh) but on the other hand a clear female predilection (75% of cases) is shown in this series.
Generally hibernomas exhibit a rather quiet clinical behavior and present as slow growing soft tissue masses that are usually painless and relative mobile. Owing to the tumor's hypervascularity, localized warmth can be depicted over the lesion at palpation [4, 6, 7, 14, 15]. The lesions can become symptomatic when compression of nearby structures occurs [6, 15]. No evidence of a malignant form of hibernoma has been reported in the English literature, except for the case published as an abstract by Teplitz et al. [24] that involved a sarcoma with hibernoma-like features. Incomplete excision results in local recurrence of the tumor; therefore marginal but complete resection is considered as the treatment of choice for these lesions [14, 24]. Even though core needle biopsy is not recommended in cases of suspected hibernoma due to the tumor's hypervascularity [9, 14, 25] all of the presented cases were preoperatively biopsied without any complications. From a macroscopic aspect, hibernomas are well-defined, encapsulated soft, lobulated masses and the color ranges from tan to red brown [15] (Figure 4G.). They usually measure from 5 to 10 cm in diameter, but they may reach up to 20 cm [4, 15]. Microscopically, the tumor is characterized by multivacuolated cells with eccentric nuclei and granular eosinophilic cytoplasm, univacuolated cells with peripheral nuclei, and smaller round cells with granular cytoplasm. The hypervascularity and the presence of cells with eosinophilic granular cytoplasm full of mitochondria give hibernomas their brown color [4, 6, 18]. From an histological point of view this entity must be distinguished from granular cell tumor, that is a benign peripheral nerve derived tumor composed of granular cells rich in mitochondria. In this regard immunohistochemistry does not help, because both tumors intensely stain for S-100 protein. The main histological difference is that hibernoma shows much more pleomorphism and focally show typical mature adipocytes, in between the granular cells. The diagnosis of lipomatoustumors is often very difficult. Molecular pathology can better classify these lesions and made past classifications out of date. But cytogenetics studies do not help in the diagnosis of hibernoma [26].
According to the 2002 WHO classification there are six histologic subtypes of hibernomas [27]. These are only of diagnostic relevance and not of prognostic value. Histopathologic evaluation of hibernomas, as previously described, is well-established and pathognomonic. On the contrary, CT and MRI features are not specific and vary with the nature and amount of lipid component [4, 12, 18, 19, 22, 23]. Non contrast CT usually demonstrates a well-demarcated soft tissue mass of predominantly low attenuation which is close but not identical to subcutaneous fat. On the other hand, more heterogeneous patterns can be encountered as well, as in this series. Internal linear, curvilinear or branching septations-like densities may be contained [7, 9, 10]. On post contrast scans, enhancement of the septa as well as more diffuse uptake, usually occurs [7, 9, and 23]. Diffuse enhancement was depicted in all the present cases whereas internal enhancing linear or curvilinear densities were shown in four out of eight cases, indicating thus internal vasculature. Even though vessels were shown in the remaining four cases on post contrast images; the absence of septations in these lesions prior to contrast infusion was attributed to the fact that these lesions had attenuations closer to muscle than fat. On MR images, as in previously published data [6–16, 18], five out of six lesions presented, on T1WSE sequences, slightly to moderately decreased signal intensity relatively to subcutaneous fat and only one showed a heterogeneous-mixed signal intensity including areas of increased and decreased intensity but on the whole slightly lower than subcutaneous fat, probably due to a greater "hibernoma" component. Three lesions on T2WSE images demonstrated slightly lower intensities than subcutaneous fat; although most authors report signal intensities closer to fat [5, 7, 9, 11–14]. The heterogeneous lesion on T1WSE remained heterogeneously hyperintense on T2WSE images as well. Finally, like in most cases [5–7, 13–17], STIR and T2 fat sat sequences failed to achieve full suppression of the examined hibernomas and displayed the most heterogeneous patterns. Gadolinium enhancement, either heterogeneous or homogeneous, is usually present in hibernomas [5, 7, 11–18]; even though Cook M et al [8] and Lee J [6] et al did not report any significant gadolinium uptake in their cases. Although, internal curvilinear structures of low signal intensity were observed on T1WSE and T2WSE sequences in all lesions, they didn't exhibit the same degree of enhancement most likely corresponding to hypocellular fibrous and fibrovascular tissue interspersed with the fatty and non fatty portions of the tumor [6, 14]. Little is known regarding the imaging of hibernomas on18 F FDG-PET scans. The reported high FDG accumulation in these fat-containing tumors may be attributed to the metabolically active cellular elements rather than reflect their malignant or not potential [28, 29].
Various differential considerations, based on imaging, can be suggested when a complex fatty mass is encountered, including benign entities like lipoma, angiolipoma and hemangioma as well as malignant tumors like liposarcoma. Lipomas present as homogeneous fatty masses with few scattered internal septa and no signs of enhancement [6]. Angiolipomas and hemangiomas can be distinguished in terms of different morphology of internal vasculature [13, 16, 17]. Several studies [4, 16–18] stress the importance of large branching intratumoral vessels with early contrast enhancement and AV shunting in the differential diagnosis of hibernomas. However these features are not always present, although fine enhancing strands may be seen [6]. In the present series, internal vessels were apparent in six MRI exams; while in total three lesions contained vessels of larger caliber as well. So, vascularity either in the form of thin enhancing septa or in the form of vessels is primarily anticipated in hibernomas. On the other hand, absence of large intratumoral vessels should not exclude hibernomas from the differential diagnosis. Well-differentiated liposarcomas are characterized by the presence of irregularly thick (>2 mm) and/or nodular septa, foci of high T2 and prominent areas of enhancement [6, 15]. Moreover, the fatty component of a well-differentiated liposarcoma appears isointense to subcutaneous fat, on T1WSE; distinguishing them from hibernomas [6]. Other lesions like myxoid liposarcoma and clear cell sarcoma could be similar to brown fat tumors but the former displays intense heterogeneity on T2 sequences and the latter primarily involves a tendon, ligament or aponeurosis [13].
This study has limitations, such as limited number of cases, and examinations performed with different techniques. None the less, this study comprises the largest number of cases of this rare tumor published thus far and elaborates effectively on its various imaging appearances. Conclusively, even if CT and MRI features are not specific, hibernoma should be strongly suggested if a soft tissue mass, exhibits higher attenuation than subcutaneous fat on CT, slightly lower signal intensity relative to subcutaneous fat on T1WSE, marked enhancement and partial fat suppression on STIR and fat-saturated sequences. These differences compared to subcutaneous fat, especially on MRI, reflect the different nature of lipid component of hibernomas and comprise the cornerstone in differentiating them from malignant lipomatous tumors. However, as in this study, other atypical findings such as more heterogeneous patterns of mixed fatty and non fatty components on unenhanced CT and MR T1W may be encountered. Furthermore internal septations, regardless of enhancement, and thin vessels contribute in establishing the diagnosis. The role of large intratumoral vessels remains questionable in characterizing hibernomas. While complete surgical resection is curative for hibernomas, knowledge of its MRI and CT features can help narrow the field of differential diagnosis and modify adequately the pre-operative planning of complex lipomatous tumors.
