Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Non-canonical WNT6/WNT10A signal factor expression in EBV+ post-transplant smooth muscle tumors

  • 1Email author,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1
Contributed equally
Clinical Sarcoma Research20188:10

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13569-018-0096-8

  • Received: 16 December 2017
  • Accepted: 7 March 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Post-transplant smooth muscle tumors (PTSMTs) are rare mesenchymal neoplasms which occur after solid organ or haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. PTSMT typically consist of Epstein–Barr-virus (EBV)+ smooth muscle-like cells and show an intermediate malignancy. Their main occurrences are visceral organs, especially the liver, but intracranial appearances are described and associated with a poor prognosis. EBV drives the growth of PTSMT; however, the underlying molecular mechanisms still remain unclear. Gene expression analysis of a set of morphologically similar tumors (leiomyomas, leiomyosarcomas, angioleiomyomas and endothelial haemangiomas) from patients without immunosuppression or EBV-association was performed. Our findings indicate that PTSMT’s growth is driven by two factors of the wingless-type protein family: WNT6 and WNT10A. We are first to report that in PTSMTs, a non-canonical activation of WNT, independent of beta-catenin, drives tumor cell proliferation via MTOR/AKT1, MYC and Cyclin D2.

Keywords

  • PTSMT
  • Post-transplant smooth muscle tumors
  • Angioleiomyomas
  • EBV
  • WNT

Background

Tumors with predominant or partial smooth muscle differentiation make up a broad spectrum of mesenchymal neoplasms. Most of these tumors are based on spontaneous mutations of a mesenchymal stem cell. A rare and virus-associated entity are the post-transplant smooth muscle tumors (PTSMT) [1, 2]. These tumors are typically positive for the Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) and can manifest themselves at any time and in any organ after transplantation [1]. Similar neoplasms can also occur in any other immunosuppressive condition, in particular after infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV; HIV-SMT) or congenital immune defects (CI-SMT) [1, 3, 4].

Post-transplant smooth muscle tumors are rare in regard to the total population (< 1% of transplanted patients [5]) but represent an important clinical and radiological differential diagnosis in immune-compromised patients, particularly to post-transplant lymphoproliferative diseases (PTLD). In PTSMT, the site of manifestation determines the patients’ outcome [2]. In particular, cerebral PTSMT has a poor prognosis, while histological features (mitotic rate, cellular atypia, and necrosis) have no prognostic impact [1].

Epstein–Barr virus is specialized to infect B cells and almost all adults harbor a small population of EBV+ non-neoplastic B cells, which are controlled by T cell homeostasis. It is not known how EBV enters non-B cell tissues, such as mesenchymal cells. It is thought that the PTSMT cell of origin is derived from a perivascular non-endothelial mesenchymal smooth muscle stem cell. EBV+ PTSMT have a type III-like latency with expression of EBV protein EBNA (Epstein–Barr nuclear antigen) but often lack EBV latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) expression [6]. The tumorigenic role of EBV in smooth muscle neoplasms is not clear because particularly HIV-SMT can be EBV negative, indicating that the virus is not absolutely necessary for aberrant smooth muscle proliferation [1].

In our previous works, we found a molecular microenvironment which is not related to EBV infection, but rather to smooth muscle differentiation [5]. In addition, EBV is able to induce neoangiogenesis, but we found only minor changes on the transcriptional level, including increased levels of angiopoietin 2 (ANGPT2) [7]. Defining driver mutations in PTSMT are still not known. However, we and others found up-regulation of MYC proto-oncogene transcripts, protein expression of phosphorylated mechanistic target of rapamycin kinase (MTOR) and phosphorylated AKT serine/threonine kinase 1 (AKT1) signaling factors [2, 6].

In the present analyses we wanted to asses if and which transcript profile of mesenchymal stem cell and signaling factors differ between PTSMT and other neoplasms with smooth muscle differentiation.

Methods

Tumor samples

EBV+ PTSMTs comprised six tumors from five patients; one patient had a tumor in the spleen and another in a cerebral sinus. We previously reported the clinical and histopathological characteristics of four of these patients [2]. The fifth patient was a female (age: 61 years) who developed a PTSMT in the liver 5 years after kidney transplantation (tumor diameter 3.1 cm, 10% Ki67, positive for EBV in situ hybridization (EBER), smooth muscle actin, caldesmon and desmin).

For control purposes, the following tumors were analyzed (Table 1, Fig. 1): (i) smooth muscle tumors (nine visceral leiomyomas and four central venous G1–2 leiomyosarcomas) and (ii) mixed smooth muscle and vascular tumors (28 with different histological subtypes of angioleiomyomas). Additionally, we added (iii) a vascular tumor control group (five endothelial haemangiomas), as the actual origin of PTSMT is still uncertain and aberrant myogenous venous wall cells are still under discussion as the cells of origin [2, 8]. Before performing molecular analysis, the angioleiomyomas were histologically sub grouped according to the old but current standard of Morimoto [9] (13/28 capillary solid, 7/28 venous, 5/28 cavernous, 3/28 mixed capillary-cavernous). All samples of formalin fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumors were selected from the archive of the Institutes of Pathology in Muenster (12/28 angioleiomyomas) and Hannover (all other samples).
Table 1

Sample set and clinical data

Entities

PTSMT

Leiomyoma (LM)

Leiomyosarcoma (LMS)

Angioleiomyoma (ALM)

Endothelial haemangioma (EHA)

Number of tumors

n = 6 (5 patients)

n = 9

n = 4

n = 28

n = 5

Age (median, range)

11.5 (6–61)

60 (29–71)

63 (45–71)

60 (23–79)

48 (32–58)

Gender

♀ 100%

♂ 0%

♀ 89%

♂ 11%

♀ 75%

♂ 25%

♀ 64%

♂ 36%

♀ 60%

♂ 40%

Tumor localisation

Kidney (n = 2)

Lung (n = 1)

Colon (n = 1)

Spleen (n = 1)

Confluens sinuum (n = 1)

Stomach (n = 3)

Kidney (n = 2)

Skin (n = 2)

Esophagus (n = 1)

Mesenterium (n = 1)

Pulmonary artery (n = 2)

Right atrium (n = 1)

Adrenal gland vein (n = 1)

Lower extremities (n = 13)

Upper extremities (n = 2)

Head–Neck (n = 3)

Genital ♀ (n = 2)

Skin/soft tissue (n = 8)

Lower extremities (n = 3)

Head–Neck (n = 1)

Mediastinal (n = 1)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Histological appearance of the five different entities. a Post transplant smooth muscle tumor (haematoxylin–eosin stain (HE stain, 100×) with inserted positive EBV-in situ hybridization (EBER), b visceral leiomyoma (HE stain, 100×), c visceral leiomyosarcoma of the central venous tract (right atrium, HE stain, 100×) with prominent atypia and increased level of mitosis figures, d endothelial haemangioma (HE stain, 100×) with prominent vessels, e angioleiomyoma (HE stain, 50×), in particular venous subtype with prominently walled vessels (arrows)

Transcript expression analysis

Samples contained > 80% tumor tissue and RNA was extracted and purified with our established mineral oil method and RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) via Maxwell® system (Promega cooperation, Mannheim, Germany). RNA was quantified by Qubit® 2.0 fluorometer (Life Technologies/Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Transcript expression analysis was performed via NanoString nCounter™ system. NanoString uses digital fluorescent reporters for gene detection and enables analysis of small amount of RNA while minimizing background signals. We used the prefabricated stem cell panel (includes 193 target genes and six endogenous control genes) as described in the manufacturer’s protocol (NanoString Technologies, Seattle, WA, USA). Endogenous control genes were glucuronidase beta (GUSB), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), clathrin heavy chain (CLTC), hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase 1 (HPRT1), phosphoglycerate kinase 1 (PGK1) and tubulin beta class I (TUBB).

Immunohistochemistry

Deparaffinized and rehydrated FFPE tissue sections (1–2 μm) were processed in an automated staining system (Benchmark ULTRA, Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., Tucson, AZ, USA). A monoclonal anti-beta-catenin antibody was used.

Data analysis

Raw data of transcript target gene expression were analyzed by nSolver™ software (NanoString Technologies) and set in relation to the average of endogenous control genes (geometric mean of controls as level of relative gene expression: reference gene index). Further statistical analysis for comparison of different tumor groups was performed with Prism 5.0 (Graph Pad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) by using the non-parametric Mann–Whitney test for two group comparison and the Krustal–Wallis test and post hoc Dunn-test for multiple comparisons. P values < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant. Heatmaps were generated using R.

Results

Increased WNT6/WNT10A levels in PTSMT

Transcript analysis showed significant differential expression of several genes among the different types of smooth muscle tumors (Table 2, Additional file 1: Figure S1). Several factors were increased in only one type of tumor. PTSMT showed increased Wnt family member 6 (WNT6) and WNT10A levels while all other types of tumors showed no different expression or low levels of these two WNT factors (Fig. 2, Table 2). WNT6 and WNT10A are encoded as a gene cluster on chromosomal segment 2q35. In individual PTSMT cases, both WNT factors were co-expressed at similar levels.
Table 2

Significant differentially regulated genes in PTSMTs and leiomyosarcomas

Regulation

Gene

Median PTSMT

Median ALM

Median LM

Median LMS

Median EHA

Upregulated in PTSMT

WNT6

0.39301

0.00961

0.00439

0.01074

0.01285

 

WNT10A

0.12282

0.00545

0.00482

0.00670

0.03415

 

MYC

0.48877

0.13366

0.11219

0.24502

0.50480

 

Cyclin D2

2.89498

0.54088

1.02805

0.44413

0.32572

Downregulated in PTSMT

WNT9B

0.00192

0.00416

0.00193

0.00951

0.01138

 

GAS1

0.02407

0.05434

0.19764

0.28556

0.30450

 

PRKD1

0.07241

0.21601

0.22282

0.15769

0.12693

 

FGFR1

0.36842

0.80905

1.72532

0.93143

0.48040

 

Beta-catenin

1.57460

2.09349

2.49687

2.23053

1.47197

Upregulated in leiomyosarcomas compared to PTSMT

WNT9B

0.00192

0.00416

0.00193

0.00951

0.01138

 

GAS1

0.02407

0.05434

0.19764

0.28556

0.30450

 

DHH

0.00297

0.01077

0.00831

0.00259

0.04553

 

LFNG

0.23836

0.77146

0.22185

0.76354

2.24482

 

MFNG

0.05390

0.07672

0.05256

0.05478

0.50480

 

PRKACA

0.85552

1.53877

1.51137

1.44838

1.70591

 

IGF

0.04295

0.12047

0.11971

0.16677

0.67152

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

ae Significant upregulated gene members of the WNT signaling pathway in PTSMT. Note that non-significant (p = ns) differences between PTSMT and other tumors regarding WNT6 and WNT10A expression are related to non-detactable transcripts in several ALM, LMS and EHA (a, b). f Beta-catenin is bound and inactivated in a complex formation containing adenomatous polyposis coli gene (APC), glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta (GSK-3beta) and axin-1 (Axin). In the classical, beta-catenin-dependent WNT signaling pathway, members of WNT family bind to the frizzled class receptors (FZD) whereas beta-catenin is set free and initiates carcinogenesis via activation of MYC and Cyclin D2

In addition to WNT6/WNT10A, cell cycle G1/S transition regulator Cyclin D2 (CCND2) was increased. As could be expected from our previous results on uterine leiomyomas and PTSMT [2], MYC proto-oncogene, bHLH transcription factor (MYC) transcripts were significantly higher in PTSMT than in non-uterine visceral leiomyomas (Fig. 2). These three factors are not encoded on 2q35 or any other chromosome 2 segment, but on chromosome 8 (MYC: 8q24) and chromosome 12 (CCND2: 12p13).

WNT9B (17q21.32), S phase entry blocker growth arrest specific 1 (GAS1) and serine/threonine protein kinase D1 (PRKD1) were expressed at low levels in PTSMT while the other analyzed tumor types showed higher levels, in particular, leiomyosarcomas. Similar to our previous results [7], fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) levels are lower in PTSMT as compared to leiomyomas.

WNT signaling-related transcript levels of catenin beta 1 (CTNNB1) were not increased in PTSMT (Fig. 2, Table 2). Beta-catenin protein expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in PTSMT. All of them showed no nuclear beta-catenin protein localisation. Compared to the other tumor types, several other canonical and non-canonical WNT signaling pathway factors were not significantly deregulated in PTSMT, in particular, frizzled class receptors (FZD), WNT1-8, WNT9A, WNT10B, WNT11 and WNT16, beta-catenin-related transcription factor 7 (TCF7), WNT signaling pathway regulator adenomatous-polyposis-coli gen (APC), glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta (GSK-3beta), Cyclin D1 (CCND1) as well as the two small GTPase ROH family members ras homolog family member A (ROHA) and cell division cycle 42 (CDC42). These findings indicate that other canonical and non-canonical WNT pathways are not activated and affirm our theory. Therefore, the downstream effectors of the elevated WNT6/WNT10A levels remain unclear.

Different gene expression profiles in PTSMT and leiomyosarcomas

There were significant differences between visceral leiomyomas, angioleiomyomas and haemangiomas (Additional file 1: Figure S1).

In comparison to all other tumors, leiomyosarcomas showed several increased gene expression levels (Table 2). The following expression levels were significantly higher in leiomyosarcomas than in PTSMT (Table 2): WNT9B, GAS1, signaling factor desert hedgehog (DHH), the two Notch signaling pathway factors LFNG O-fucosylpeptide 3-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase provided (LFNG) and MFNG O-fucosylpeptide 3-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase (MFNG), protein kinase cAMP-activated catalytic subunit alpha (PRKACA) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1). Roland et al. [10] showed that leiomyosarcomas also express the IGF receptor which indicates paracrine activation.

Histopathological subgroups of angioleiomyomas show no molecularpathological correlation

There are three distinct histopathological subtypes of angioleiomyomas which were originally described on the basis of histopathological features by Morimoto in 1973 [9]. Regarding the genes under investigation, manly these subgroups showed the same molecularpathological characteristics. Only six genes show significant differences between the angioleiomyoma types (ISL1, NCSTN, TCF7, WNT10A, WNT11, WNT7A) but their relative expression levels were very low, which indicates no biological relevance (< 0.4 compared to standardized reference gene index).

Discussion

Post-transplant smooth muscle tumor share morphological similarities with leiomyomas and low-grade leiomyosarcomas and only show rarely high-grade atypia. One of the main differences is the EBV association. Our previous molecular analysis showed no clear relationship between EBV infection of tumor cells and (de)regulation of gene expression. One reason could be that PTSMT usually do not express LMP1, a viral protein which is associated with manipulation of the host cell cycle and cytokine expression. In one of the very first analyses which addressed the question of specific signaling pathway deregulation in PTSMT, Ong et al. [6] demonstrated that these tumors express phosphorylated MTOR and phosphorylated AKT1 proteins and that Ras association domain family member 1 (RASSF1) was hypermethylated. Activated MTOR/AKT1 signaling, RASSF1 hypermethylation and MYC expression can also be found in a subset of leiomyosarcomas [6, 11, 12]. We could confirm our previous result that PTSMT have higher expression levels of MYC than uterine and non-uterine leiomyomas. In our current analysis we found that this difference regarding MYC was not significant in comparison to leiomyosarcomas. Remarkably, for the very first time, we could show that PTSMT are characterized by WNT6/WNT10A regulation while all other tumor entities under investigation showed almost no expression of these two factors. There are no reports on a particular WNT6 or WNT10A expression in EBV infected cells [13, 14]. Therefore, it is unlikely that EBV is the main cause of this WNT6/WNT10A expression. The only other known tumor entity characterized by WNT6/WNT10A overexpression are colorectal carcinomas and it is assumed that their mode of proliferation is linked to differential beta-catenin expression—as opposed to PTSMTs [15].

Both genes are encoded as a cluster on segment 2q35. Co-expression of these two factors indicates a co-regulation of the respective promotors. The fact that many canonical WNT signaling factors were not increased and that we found no nuclear beta-catenin indicates activation of the non-canonical WNT pathway. Similar to PTSMT, leiomyosarcomas usually show no aberrant nuclear beta-catenin expression [10, 16]. Non-canonical WNT signaling is often characterized by alternative signaling without cytoplasmic stabilization of soluble beta-catenin [1719]. These include the WNT/calcium pathway and the planar cell polarity (PCP). In those alternative pathways, other WNT factors than WNT6 and WNT10A are usually involved [1719]. In contrast to PTSMT, it has been shown in renal cell carcinoma that WNT10A is involved in canonical WNT/beta-catenin signaling [20]. In the murine kidney, Wnt6 is also related to canonical Wnt/beta-catenin signaling [21]. In mesenchymal cells expression of WNT6, WNT10A and WNT10B can be associated with osteoblastogenesis and inhibition of adipogenesis but not with smooth muscle differentiation [22]. WNT6 is involved in differentiation of non-smooth muscle myogenic cells, e.g. in the heart, and proliferation of stromal cells in the placenta [2326]. There are reports which imply a special relationship between WNT/beta catenin signaling and CCND2 in glioma cells [27] but not in smooth muscle cells. At least in cardiomyocytes, there are evidences of a MYC-dependent activation of CCND2 [28]. In insulin sensitive pancreatic beta cells, activated MTOR leads to CCND2-associated proliferation [29, 30]. Therefore, these signaling factors could also be linked in PTSMT. Based on the finding that MTOR signaling is activated, Sirolimus has been used for targeted therapy in PTSMT [31].

Conclusions

In summary, we are the first to report that PTSMT cells may harbor a unique variant of a non-canonical WNT pathway, which is based on WNT6/WNT10A, and which may induce cell proliferation and differentiation via MTOR/AKT1, MYC and CCND2.

Notes

Abbreviations

AKT1: 

serin/threonin kinase 1

ANGPT2: 

angiopoietin 2

APS: 

adenomatous-polyposis-coli gen

CCND1: 

Cyclin-D1

CCND2: 

Cyclin-D2

CDC42: 

cell division cycle 42

CI-SMT: 

congenital immune defects-smooth muscle tumors

CLTC: 

clathrin heavy chain

CTNNB1: 

beta-catenin 1

DHH: 

desert hedgehog

EBER: 

Epstein–Barr virus

EBNA: 

Epstein–Barr nuclear antigen

EBV: 

Epstein–Barr virus-encoded small RNA

FFPE: 

formalin fixed and paraffin-embedded

FGFR1: 

fibroblast growth factor receptor 1

FZD: 

frizzled class receptor

GAPDH: 

glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase

GAS1: 

S phase entry blocker growth arrest specific 1

GSK-3beta: 

glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta

GUSB: 

glucuronidase beta

HE: 

hematoxylin and eosin

HIV: 

human immunodeficiency virus

HIV-SMT: 

human immunodeficiency virus smooth muscle tumors

HPRT1: 

hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase 1

IGF: 

insulin like growth factor 1

ISL1: 

insulin gene enhancer protein

LFNG: 

LFNG O-fucosylpeptide 3-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase provided

LMP1: 

latent membrane protein 1

MFNG: 

MFNG O-fucosylpeptide 3-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase

MTOR: 

rapamycin kinase

NCSTN: 

nicastrin

PCP: 

planar cell polarity

PGK1: 

phosphoglycerate kinase 1

PRKACA: 

protein kinase cAMP-activated catalytic subunit alpha

PRKD1: 

serine/threonine protein kinase D1

PTLD: 

post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease

PTSMT: 

post-transplant smooth muscle tumor

RASSF1: 

Ras associated domain family member 1

ROHA: 

GTPase ROH family members ras homolog family member A

TCF7: 

beta-catenin-related transcription factor 7

TUBB: 

tubulin beta class 1

WNT6: 

WNT family gene member 6

WNT10A: 

WNT family gene member 10A

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

Histomorphology (KT, DJ, KH, FL, JR, HK), molecular analysis (KT, MK, DJ), data collection, analysis of data and manuscript preparation (MK, KT, DJ, KH). All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Collaborative Research Centre 738 (CRC 738), in particular Danny Jonigk and Florian Laenger. The authors would like to thank A. Hori for patiently translating the original angioleiomyoma paper by Morimoto form Japanese to German. Furthermore, the authors thank Annette Mueller-Brechlin, Regina Engelhardt and Christina Fiedler for their excellent technical support, Helge Stark for his statistical advice and Jan Lukas Robertus and Kara Diemer for editing the text.

Competing interests

The authors have no commercial associations relevant for this study and potential conflicts of interest do not exist.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The retrospective study of archived tissue has been approved by the Ethics committee, Hannover Medical School (Nr. 2893-2015). All authors have read the manuscript in its final form and approve of its submission. The same is true for the contributors mentioned under “Acknowledgements”.

Funding

The project was funded by the German Research Foundation as part of Collaborative Research Centre 738 (CRC738, Danny Jonigk, Florian Laenger).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Pathology, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
(2)
Institute of Pathology, University of Muenster, Domagkstraße 17, 48149 Muenster, Germany

References

  1. Hussein K, Rath B, Ludewig B, Kreipe H, Jonigk D. Clinico-pathological characteristics of different types of immunodeficiency-associated smooth muscle tumours. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50(14):2417–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Jonigk D, Laenger F, Maegel L, Izykowski N, Rische J, Tiede C, Klein C, Maecker-Kolhoff B, Kreipe H, Hussein K. Molecular and clinicopathological analysis of Epstein–Barr virus-associated posttransplant smooth muscle tumors. Am J Transplant. 2012;12(7):1908–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Issarachaikul R, Shuangshoti S, Suankratay C. Epstein–Barr virus-associated smooth muscle tumors in AIDS patients: a largest case (series). Intern Med. 2014;53(20):2391–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Schober T, Magg T, Laschinger M, Rohlfs M, Linhares ND, Puchalka J, Weisser T, Fehlner K, Mautner J, Walz C, Hussein K, Jaeger G, Kammer B, Schmid I, Bahia M, Pena SD, Behrends U, Belohradsky BH, Klein C, Hauck F. A human immunodeficiency syndrome caused by mutations in CARMIL2. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14209.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Jonigk D, Izykowski N, Maegel L, Schormann E, Maecker-Kolhoff B, Laenger F, Kreipe H, Hussein K. MicroRNA expression in Epstein–Barr virus-associated post-transplant smooth muscle tumours is related to leiomyomatous phenotype. Clin Sarcoma Res. 2013;3(1):9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Ong KW, Teo M, Lee V, Ong D, Lee A, Tan CS, Vathsala A, Toh HC. Expression of EBV latent antigens, mammalian target of rapamycin, and tumor suppression genes in EBV-positive smooth muscle tumors: clinical and therapeutic implications. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(17):5350–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Jonigk D, Izykowski N, Maegel L, Schormann E, Ludewig B, Kreipe H, Hussein K. Tumour angiogenesis in Epstein–Barr virus-associated post-transplant smooth muscle tumours. Clin Sarcoma Res. 2014;4(1):1.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Chaves NJ, Kotsimbos TC, Warren MA, et al. Cranial leiomyosarcoma in an Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-mismatched lung transplant recipient. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2007;26:753–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Morimoto N. Angiomyoma (vascular leiomyoma): a clinicopathological study. Med J Kagoshima Univ. 1973;24:663–83.Google Scholar
  10. Roland CL, Boland GM, Demicco EG, Lusby K, Ingram D, May CD, Kivlin CM, Watson K, Al Sannaa GA, Wang WL, Ravi V, Pollock RE, Lev D, Cormier JN, Hunt KK, Feig BW, Lazar AJ, Torres KE. Clinical observations and molecular variables of primary vascular leiomyosarcoma. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(4):347–54.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Setsu N, Yamamoto H, Kohashi K, Endo M, Matsuda S, Yokoyama R, Nishiyama K, Iwamoto Y, Dobashi Y, Oda Y. The Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin pathway is activated and associated with adverse prognosis in soft tissue leiomyosarcomas. Cancer. 2012;118(6):1637–48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Tsiatis AC, Herceg ME, Keedy VL, Halpern JL, Holt GE, Schwartz HS, Cates JM. Prognostic significance of c-Myc expression in soft tissue leiomyosarcoma. Mod Pathol. 2009;22(11):1432–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Chou J, Lin YC, Kim J, You L, Xu Z, He B, Jablons DM. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma—review of the molecular mechanisms of tumorigenesis. Head Neck. 2008;30(7):946–63.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Pang MF, Lin KW, Peh SC. The signaling pathways of Epstein–Barr virus-encoded latent membrane protein 2A (LMP2A) in latency and cancer. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2009;14(2):222–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kirikoshi H, Sekihara H, Katoh M. WNT10A and WNT6, clustered in human chromosome 2q35 region with head-to-tail manner, are strongly coexpressed in SW480. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;283(4):798–805.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gogou PN, Batistatou A, Pakos EE, Apostolikas N, Stefanou D, Tsekeris PG. Expression of E-cadherin, beta-catenin and topoisomerase II alpha in leiomyosarcomas. Clin Transl Oncol. 2009;11(8):548–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Cuppens T, Tuyaerts S, Amant F. Potential therapeutic targets in uterine sarcomas. Sarcoma. 2015;2015:243298.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Kim JH, Park SY, Jun Y, Kim JY, Nam JS. Roles of Wnt target genes in the journey of cancer stem cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(8):1604. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18081604.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Sedgwick AE, D’Souza-Schorey C. Wnt signaling in cell motility and invasion: drawing parallels between development and cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2016;8(9):80. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers8090080.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Hsu RJ, Ho JY, Cha TL, Yu DS, Wu CL, Huang WP, Chu P, Chen YH, Chen JT, Yu CP. WNT10A plays an oncogenic role in renal cell carcinoma by activating WNT/beta-catenin pathway. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(10):e47649.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Beaton H, Andrews D, Parsons M, Murphy M, Gaffney A, Kavanagh D, McKay GJ, Maxwell AP, Taylor CT, Cummins EP, Godson C, Higgins DF, Murphy P, Crean J. Wnt6 regulates epithelial cell differentiation and is dysregulated in renal fibrosis. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2016;311(1):F35–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Cawthorn WP, Bree AJ, Yao Y, Du B, Hemati N, Martinez-Santibanez G, MacDougald OA. Wnt6, Wnt10a and Wnt10b inhibit adipogenesis and stimulate osteoblastogenesis through a beta-catenin-dependent mechanism. Bone. 2012;50(2):477–89.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hitchins L, Fletcher F, Allen S, Dhoot GK. Role of Sulf1A in Wnt1- and Wnt6-induced growth regulation and myoblast hyper-elongation. FEBS Open Bio. 2012;3:30–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Lavery DL, Martin J, Turnbull YD, Hoppler S. Wnt6 signaling regulates heart muscle development during organogenesis. Dev Biol. 2008;323(2):177–88.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Schmeckpeper J, Verma A, Yin L, Beigi F, Zhang L, Payne A, Zhang Z, Pratt RE, Dzau VJ, Mirotsou M. Inhibition of Wnt6 by Sfrp2 regulates adult cardiac progenitor cell differentiation by differential modulation of Wnt pathways. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2015;85:215–25.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang Q, Lu J, Zhang S, Wang S, Wang W, Wang B, Wang F, Chen Q, Duan E, Leitges M, Kispert A, Wang H. Wnt6 is essential for stromal cell proliferation during decidualization in mice. Biol Reprod. 2013;88(1):5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhang H, Wei DL, Wan L, Yan SF, Sun YH. Highly expressed lncRNA CCND2-AS1 promotes glioma cell proliferation through Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2017;482(4):1219–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Murray TV, Smyrnias I, Schnelle M, Mistry RK, Zhang M, Beretta M, Martin D, Anilkumar N, de Silva SM, Shah AM, Brewer AC. Redox regulation of cardiomyocyte cell cycling via an ERK1/2 and c-Myc-dependent activation of Cyclin D2 transcription. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2015;79:54–68.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Lakshmipathi J, Alvarez-Perez JC, Rosselot C, Casinelli GP, Stamateris RE, Rausell-Palamos F, O’Donnell CP, Vasavada RC, Scott DK, Alonso LC, Garcia-Ocana A. PKCzeta is essential for pancreatic beta-cell replication during insulin resistance by regulating mTOR and Cyclin-D2. Diabetes. 2016;65(5):1283–96.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Stamateris RE, Sharma RB, Kong Y, Ebrahimpour P, Panday D, Ranganath P, Zou B, Levitt H, Parambil NA, O’Donnell CP, Garcia-Ocana A, Alonso LC. Glucose induces mouse beta-cell proliferation via IRS2, MTOR, and Cyclin D2 but not the insulin receptor. Diabetes. 2016;65(4):981–95.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Tan CS, Loh HL, Foo MW, Choong LH, Wong KS, Kee TY. Epstein–Barr virus-associated smooth muscle tumors after kidney transplantation: treatment and outcomes in a single center. Clin Transplant. 2013;27(4):E462–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement